What's Up?
by essay

Comment by graphicfunk:
Very well done. I once entered a similar image but with a candle instead. I am sure you did better. I thought the flame pointed upside down would have proved interesting. Regardless, you have a technique that can lend itself to other ideas.

What's Up?
by essay

Comment by one2one:
Great shot Stan, glad it did well.

Reactions to a Wild Pitch
by essay

Comment by Skip:
freakin hilarious!

What's Up?
by essay

Comment by william88:
Beautiful!!

What's Up?
by essay

Comment by Jacqueline:
Love it!

What's Up?
by essay

Comment by GregoryB:
Nice camera inversion - excellent detail in the flowers and vases

Urban Garden
by essay

Comment by PennyStreet:
Nice one - I walk by this everyday and didn't plan it so well!!

Urban Garden
by essay

Comment by Tammster:
Gorgeous!

What's Up?
by essay

Comment by jonkster:
sorry had to give a 6. Everyone judges differently but for me the image demonstrates double exposure well but the double exposure doesn't actually enhance the impact of the image (to me). To me it says - "here is a really clean image of a flower and here it is upside down to show a technique"... and I think - "does doing that really make the photo better?" I know you are caught between a rock and a hard place... on this site some people tend to judge highly on meeting the challenge (hopefully they will score you highly to balance me) and you have met it well and some judge more on the overall impact. I lean a lot on the impact side - sorry it didn't do the impact (for me). If you could have managed to have something different about the 2 parts then that probably would have pushed it higher in my eyes.

NB that is just me - no criticism of technique (is well done) just a long winded comment how it struck me as an individual.

Urban Garden
by essay

Comment by Lelez:
WOW! Amazing shot. Winner!