Image |
Comment |
| 07/13/2008 11:43:48 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 07/12/2008 10:26:03 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 07/10/2008 11:07:39 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 07/10/2008 07:41:44 AM |
Dont beat yourself up about itby jonfrommkComment by bassbone: Jon
I just saw this in the recently commented photos - I seemed to have missed this one in April...
In order to make these photostitches work well, the exposures really need to be the same in all settings including white balance, f-stop, exposure time etc. Going full manual really helps smoothing these out.
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 07/10/2008 07:20:20 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 07/09/2008 11:25:12 AM |
Conservation and Congregationby jonfrommkComment by Melethia:
Here's your ribbon - display it proudly!
And funny that Peter thinks it's too soft - I think there's too much sharpening near the tree/sky border. I think most landscapes unless richly colored suffer from the 640 pixel size. The other comment I'd offer is that the straight line/centered comp is somewhat static. All that said, I really love the foreground field. I've been trying to get good field shots for some time. A lovely classic of such is zeuszen's entry in the free study. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 07/09/2008 09:31:43 AM |
Conservation and Congregationby jonfrommkComment by bassbone: Jon
The layers created by the grass, the trees, and the sky are well placed and give this the prototypical rule of thirds feel. The church looks like it has a lot of charm and interest, but with the small image size (don't you just hate 640?) the details are mostly lost
I just wonder about the choice of b/w here - were you trying to have the sky and the field look similar as if it is a reflection? If so, I think more details in the grass field are needed to give it the shimmering feel. If not the point, I think a color version may have been a better approach - to highlight the warm summer sky and the glow off the grass.
I really think the main reason for the low-ish score is an overall softness to the image...don't forget that us DPCers need it sharp, sharp, sharp! |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 07/09/2008 08:56:31 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 07/09/2008 12:46:55 AM |
Conservation and Congregationby jonfrommkComment by colorcarnival: What a shame - no comments. Oh well - I get to be first! How did this look in color? The field in the foreground looks interesting and that's why i ask. I like the details on the trees in the background. Looks pretty rural to me! |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 07/08/2008 01:22:19 AM |
The O2by jonfrommkComment by Charlene: Good idea with the processing. Something seen so many times, but in such a different way making it new again.
(looks like I was right this time :)) Cxxx |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/01/2025 06:22:31 AM EDT.