Image |
Comment |
| 01/05/2004 12:48:06 AM |
Aerial Assault by moodvilleComment by Gracious: Beautiful! Excellent detail, good dof. The only nitpick would be to allow a bit more room for his feet. I hope this does well. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/05/2004 12:26:36 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/03/2004 09:45:21 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/01/2004 02:43:09 PM |
Frosted Beautyby moodvilleComment by crabappl3: Sometimes the simple world in front of us produces images of great beauty. I'm sure many have walked past plants with the same formations of ice on them, but they probably have never seen the simple beauty you show here. I love your b/w conversions and crisp focus on the ice. Excellent shot! 10 -danny |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/01/2004 11:02:37 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/01/2004 12:31:14 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 12/28/2003 05:56:23 PM |
Nature's Treasureby moodvilleComment by dr rick: The center and corners being the only things in focus gives this a rather funky appearance. Maybe it would work if there was some space around the in-focus bracts at top and bottom, but I don't find it very interesting as it is. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 12/28/2003 03:22:22 PM |
Nature's Treasureby moodvilleComment by sn4psh07: Interesting picture, very shallow depth of field and almost a complete lack of noise. I also like a way that the border draws your eye towards the dark parts of the image, therefore providing greater contrast to the blue in the image.
I personally think that the depth of field should either have be used to concentrat on just one particular part of the image, or that you should have used a greater depth of field to show off the shape that you have in this particular picture. The shape is not really borne out by the fact that it is a bit blurred.
Also by using a very shallow depth of field, but not concentrating on just one particular element, you have ended up with a picture where you effectively have three parts in focus which are on a diagonal from bottom left to top right. This leaves the opposing diagonal somewhat empty and devoid of focus. Maybe it is this that seems to unbalanced this particular image.
As it stands there is something that I don't quite like about the image, but it is very good nonetheless. You have also achieved very crisp focus, which is obviously a benefit in a macro. Good luck. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 12/23/2003 10:01:51 AM |
Nature's Treasureby moodvilleComment by ahaze: Technical: fits the challenge. Exposure composition focus lighting all good. Is this a duotone, or...?
Personal: This is so macro I can't tell what it is!
My vote: 7 |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 12/21/2003 08:56:29 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/08/2025 11:21:31 PM EDT.