DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 
Browse Settings
Currently viewing:
Registered User2mccs

Show comments:

Per page:

Order:

Comments:


Comments Received by 2mccs
Pages:   ... ... [366]
Showing 291 - 300 of ~3660
Image Comment
Spend more time working on abstract photography
01/13/2017 03:49:00 AM
Spend more time working on abstract photography
by 2mccs

Comment by docjonny:
Absolutely beatiful.. great capture.
Photographer found comment helpful.
Quiet morning
01/11/2017 11:33:49 AM
Quiet morning
by 2mccs

Comment by riot:
Originally posted by pointandshoot:

It is your obnoxious presentation, not your comment, that is offensive. A ‘good’ photographer understands the technical details. An ‘excellent’ photographer has forgotten them. A ’soul-less’ photographer judges the worth of a photo by them.

These irrelevant generalisations don't suffice to hide the utter nonsense of your primary statement.

None of what I said has been in any way "obnoxious". After taking the trouble to vote on a contest (on a site that has rapidly diminsihing voter numbers), I have subsequently taken the trouble to clearly and politely comment, explaining my vote - something that, as I'm sure you're aware, increasingly few participants of the site do these days. Receiving this kind of information is something that I personally value very highly on my own work, from other voters. I have subsequently returned to the discussion to answer some snide remarks, and explain precisely why what I said was appropriate, technically correct, and why I stand behind it - again, clearly and politely.

As for the discussion on why I chose to rate images low in this contest that relied entirely on digital effects, that was well covered in the forum post that 2mccs also participated in at the time of the contest, and doesn't need to be rehashed here.

The fact is it's thin skinned critiqueophobes such as yourself who have driven the site into its current sorry state, where everyone is terrified of explaining their vote, or sharing the faults they found in the photograph with its creator - for fear of having some sanctimonious commenter attack them in the comments with some semi-ad-hominem generalisation rubbish, as you've done, about what a "soul-less photographer" does, because they have found fault in yours or someone else's image. The fact also is that most photographers come to this site to learn and improve their skills, and attitudes such as yours are directly interfering with them receiving the very critique they need.

I don't intend to bow to that sort of rubbish from you and others like you, but I do intend to call it out when I see it, because it's important that everyone here who complains about the current commentless state of the site is aware - it's exactly people like you who have brought it to this state.
Photographer found comment helpful.
footfalls
01/07/2017 09:56:31 PM
footfalls
by 2mccs

Comment by PennyStreet:
Wildly entertaining. Love this.
Photographer found comment helpful.
footfalls
01/07/2017 08:36:17 PM
footfalls
by 2mccs

Comment by tnun:
mmn. I would play this again, like Bach's Inventions.
Photographer found comment helpful.
Quiet morning
01/07/2017 12:35:55 PM
Quiet morning
by 2mccs

Comment by pointandshoot:
Originally posted by riot:

I'm sorry if this offends you, but I stand entirely by my comment - this photograph is nothing at all without reliance on an entirely digital effect.


It is your obnoxious presentation, not your comment, that is offensive. A ‘good’ photographer understands the technical details. An ‘excellent’ photographer has forgotten them. A ’soul-less’ photographer judges the worth of a photo by them.

Message edited by author 2017-01-07 13:07:47.
Photographer found comment helpful.
footfalls
01/07/2017 12:20:57 PM
footfalls
by 2mccs

Comment by mitalapo:
nicely intriguing
Photographer found comment helpful.
Quiet morning
01/07/2017 10:13:41 AM
Quiet morning
by 2mccs

Comment by riot:
Originally posted by mitalapo:

Originally posted by riot:

Relies on a photoshop filter to produce the majority of its value in meeting the challenge: 2.

broken preconceptions are gold.

This relies on the "digital zoom" feature of an iphone, which acts by blowing up the original image and tiling in new pixels in a bilateral blur, a "smart blur" effect; this is absolutely no different than a photoshop filter, the only change is that it's done by your phone's software instead of by photoshop. I'm sorry if this offends you, but I stand entirely by my comment - this photograph is nothing at all without reliance on an entirely digital effect.
leaves in the tree
01/03/2017 02:03:32 PM
leaves in the tree
by 2mccs

Comment by posthumous:
sorry I didn't get back to this. It would have ribboned in my head.
Photographer found comment helpful.
footfalls
01/02/2017 08:40:53 PM
footfalls
by 2mccs

Comment by bvy:
Yep. I see him.
Photographer found comment helpful.
leaves in the tree
01/02/2017 03:17:34 AM
leaves in the tree
by 2mccs

Comment by chalice:
An interesting technique and result. Thanks for sharing the process you used.

This deserved a much better score than the voters gave overall. It was under appreciated IMHO.

Message edited by author 2017-01-02 03:19:31.
Photographer found comment helpful.
Pages:   ... ... [366]
Showing 291 - 300 of ~3660


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/05/2025 08:31:04 PM EDT.