splendor
by posthumous

Comment by tnun:
in the glass.

splendor
by posthumous

Comment by skewsme:
vicious beast!

Seasons
by posthumous

Comment by mariuca:
I agree very much with Henry on the marriage (coexistence) between text and image. I think that I made before a comment to another one of your essays regarding the font of the text and its placement.
In this particular one the classic font diminishes the pictures. They cannot occupy the same place equally. The words have to either whisper or shout, or perhaps we have to read every word at a time , separately. It's a matter of sheer design of a page, probably not interesting to you that much but for me image and word are our tools.
The first and last page are superb - the white floating lines are words actually, they came from a pen with white ink and made little comments here and there. This is how the letters of the words of the poem shall flow. Perhaps not an elegant font, perhaps not same heightâ€Â¦.perhaps I talk too much.

photoessay7
by posthumous

Comment by mariuca:
Formidable image and words

photoessay6
by posthumous

Comment by mariuca:
A little Corot

Angel
by posthumous

Comment by mitalapo:
those wings can take her a long way

Angel
by posthumous

Comment by tnun:
oh my dear. there is always some tremendous unfathomable story behind the face of a little girl like this one.

Too much of water hast thou, poor Ophelia
by posthumous

Comment by mitalapo:

(assuming we play domino)

daughters
by posthumous

Comment by snaffles:
extreme dutch angle, faded out, composition needs a lot more work. Not high key.

Too much of water hast thou, poor Ophelia
by posthumous

Comment by grahamgator:
Ha, this made me smile; great analogy.