The Parting of the Seas
by redeyedfrog

Comment by Dmosier21:
Not sure what the statute would have looked like in the image, but it would likely explain the point/theme to which your title refers (I do get your photo though!)? Way to challenge the literalites in using their imagination.

Gateway to the Western World
by redeyedfrog

Comment by swatalla:
it needs more contrast. just kidding! i like it, its natural...

Gateway to the Western World
by redeyedfrog

Comment by Trumpeteer4:
Nice perspective, the line draws the viewer in and out of the photo. I would suggest boosting contrast to make the arch more distinguishable from the sky.

Gateway to the Western World
by redeyedfrog

Comment by CassieDoodle:
cool shot. i think a boost of contrast and saturation really could take this image to the next level.

Gateway to the Western World
by redeyedfrog

Comment by EBJones:
Very clean and simple. Almost abstract.

Gateway to the Western World
by redeyedfrog

Comment by Nuzzer:
Doesnt feel like a "gateway" and could do with a contrast boost too

The Parting of the Seas
by redeyedfrog

Comment by Blackbox:
Hey, how many times do I have to tell you mister? No running by the pool!

The Parting of the Seas
by redeyedfrog

Comment by BrianR:
What road is this

The Parting of the Seas
by redeyedfrog

Comment by swatalla:
I am impressed with the creative thought put into this beautiful and abstract piece of art. This work is a welcome tangent to the tedious and uninteresting snapshots of dusty old roads or calm streams. For those of you unperceptive enough to take note of the inanimate man appearing to leap over the violently thrashing waters beneath, this image certainly does portray that of a road (which can also refer to a path, or a means of arriving to a destination, including aqueous mediums) which one would not want to frequently travel. I applaud this refreshingly original piece, and do not doubt that the beauty of this fine piece reflects that of the photgrapher's mind.

The Parting of the Seas
by redeyedfrog

Comment by stanm2:
don't get the point