| Image | Comment | 
|  | 11/30/2005 03:27:07 PM | 
|  | 
|  | 11/30/2005 12:59:41 PM | 
|  | 
|  | 11/15/2005 11:12:37 PM | 
| Urban landscapeby bjvermeulenComment by MikeJ: This would have gotten a higher vote from me if the lights of the buildings had been sharp. It looks like this was taken handheld rather than on a tripod. The color and clouds are interesting. | 
|  | 11/15/2005 12:10:44 PM | 
|  | 
|  | 11/14/2005 10:40:01 PM | 
|  | 
|  | 11/14/2005 07:25:12 PM | 
|  | 
|  | 11/14/2005 04:15:46 PM | 
| Urban landscapeby bjvermeulenComment by io: Sorry to be harsh, but my scoring is:
 2/2 ΓΆ€“ Subject suitability
 0/4 ΓΆ€“ Technical & artistic skill = intesting colour but lacks detail/lack if focus makes it look very busy/confusing,
 0/3 ΓΆ€“ Overall appeal = no interest or attraction
 0/1 ΓΆ€“ Extra merit = no wow factor
 | 
|  Photographer found comment helpful. | 
|  | 11/11/2005 07:21:22 PM | 
|  | 
|  Photographer found comment helpful. | 
|  | 11/11/2005 07:07:09 PM | 
|  | 
|  Photographer found comment helpful. | 
|  | 11/10/2005 04:37:24 AM | 
| Urban landscapeby bjvermeulenComment by RobMol: Cool image. I think the picture would look better if the horizon was at 1/3 of the picture. The trees are a bit blurry, could be better perhaps with some more sharpening? The picture somehow seems to lack depth to me. | 
|  Photographer found comment helpful. | 
	
	
			Home -
			
Challenges -
			
Community -
			
League -
			
Photos -
			
Cameras -
			
Lenses -
			
Learn -
			
			
Help -
			
Terms of Use -
			
Privacy -
			
Top ^
		DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
		
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
		
Current Server Time: 10/30/2025 11:57:00 PM EDT.