Image |
Comment |
| 07/29/2004 08:00:34 PM |
|
| 07/29/2004 11:40:41 AM |
white308.jpgby DrJOnesComment by Pioneer: I wouldn't call it a porn effect at all. The photo is great the way it is. If this bothers you, why look in the nude galleries, what were you expecting to see ?
Originally posted by goodganesh: why was the dress see-thru? would prefer such a nice pic without that porn effect |
|
| 07/28/2004 09:38:05 AM |
|
| 07/28/2004 09:05:11 AM |
|
| 07/28/2004 09:03:30 AM |
white308.jpgby DrJOnesComment by blindjustice: would this shot be any less erotic without the nippleage? probably not, but its perfect the way it is. great shot dr.
oh yeah, isn't it a rule of photography that "eyes attract eyes" well guess what- something else attracts eyes too. |
| 07/23/2004 06:24:16 PM |
soft sun by DrJOnesComment by DrJOnes: steinar: same hat, same girl, same photographer. Different location. ;-) |
| 07/23/2004 03:25:29 PM |
|
| 07/20/2004 08:28:21 PM |
white308.jpgby DrJOnesComment by DrJOnes: Thanks Theo. Keep up with the practice. You'll get there!
goodganesh: I find that people often use the word "porn" to describe erotic images that offend them. It doesn't mean anything, at least not to me. Too bad you didn't like the pic. Message edited by author 2004-07-21 14:53:01. |
| 07/20/2004 02:24:00 AM |
|
| 07/18/2004 10:00:32 PM |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 06/22/2025 10:35:50 PM EDT.