Octopussy
by neolestat

Comment by yanko:
I assume by now this photo was brought to the attention of the SC/admins so how about we just let them decide if this breaks the TOS?

I agree with those who said neolestat's only goal with this photo was to ruffle feathers. Well mission accomplished thanks to US! Perhaps ignoring this photo or quietly reporting it and moving on would have been the proper thing to do.

Message edited by author 2006-10-18 22:59:53.

Octopussy
by neolestat

Comment by enriqueavila:
so my question is... where are the limits between art and porn?.. haha i mean its not that i hate porn.. i love porn sometimes haha but this pic is not what i'd expect to see in this site.. period.

Octopussy
by neolestat

Comment by abcmorgan:
Classic, LMAO!
Can you do Plenty O'Toole & Pussy Galore next?
I find it amazing how we can pass no comment on the names Octopussy, Plenty O'Toole & Pussy Galore etc. in a James Bond movie considering the rather obvious images they conjure up, yet we start panicking and circling the conservative wagons when confronted with the image directly. Not something I'd ever hang on my wall but fair play to you for stirring up a debate.

Octopussy
by neolestat

Comment by cuspie:

Originally posted by BRCPRES: If this is what this site is coming to, I don't think I'll renew. Inappropriate, and not a very good photo at that.

Then don't go to the nude gallery.

Edit to say I think this photo is just too funny!

Message edited by author 2006-10-18 15:17:39.

Octopussy
by neolestat

Comment by OmanOtter:
Sorry if I offended anyone with my uptight comment, but it's what I believe. I may be new to this site, but that's not a reason to discount my opinion. The thing is, I live in a country where everything is censored. In fact, I don't even have any idea why I am able to access the nude portion of DPChallenge. It must be that the government here hasn't figured it out yet. Because, trust me, you can't get to any other nude sites. In fact, my wife just had a baby. She tried to look up breast feeding information but the government had blocked all sites referring to that as being in violation of public decency standards. So you may imagine how I feel about censorship. Is the picture raunchy? I guess so. But is it as bad as you say? I don't think so.

Octopussy
by neolestat

Comment by B74A:
Nice idea, provoking, yes, and since it is still here, I guess OK for the rules.

Why hasn't anyone asked yet whether or not animals were hurt in the shooting of this photography? Me assuming the poor animal is already dead, or would it otherwise be using its suction cups?

I saw a postcard once that looked like a hairy wolfs eye, at first glance, but then it appears it is a glass eye in the middle, and what is around the glass eye is not from a wolf, and it is not an eye! Mist funny thing about it were the viewers who could only see it as a wolfs eye. To them there was no joke!

Octopussy
by neolestat

Comment by fotomann_forever:

Originally posted by OmanOtter: Wow. What a lot of uptight people are out there!

I shoot a lot of nudes and I've shot stuff a LOT more graphic than this. Uptight wouldn't be the right word to describe me.

Message edited by author 2006-10-17 13:32:37.

Octopussy
by neolestat

Comment by brettt83:

Originally posted by OmanOtter: Wow. What a lot of uptight people are out there!

I don't think people on here are uptight, maybe they are just a bit woriied that
1 it does not fit the rules of this site
2 that there are children who look at this site
3 as i said before that this pic is crap and does not belong here

Octopussy
by neolestat

Comment by Brad:

Originally posted by OmanOtter: Wow. What a lot of uptight people are out there!

hmmmm...member for 12 days, no site input except for this.
Come back in a few years and you will understand why we are protective of this site.

Octopussy
by neolestat

Comment by OmanOtter:
Wow. What a lot of uptight people are out there!