Octopussy
by neolestat

Comment by NVPhoto:
WOW! I can't believe the narrow mindedness of the commenters of this image. I thought this was a site for artists. How can anyone claim they are an artist if they are not receptive to all styles? All art has its place and purpose and should be respected. If you don't like it, stop looking. Asking for removal or chastising the photog is what most call censorship.

Lighten up, take a look and see what emotions this image brings up. If you find it vulgar, close your eyes, there are plenty of sunsets and water drops to look at if you need G rated material.

To the photog, nice job taking a photo you wanted to take and not caring what conservative idiots have to think. Keep up the good work.

Charley Victoria
by neolestat

Comment by h2:
you shouldn't add a signature (or any other text)

Charley Victoria
by neolestat

Comment by heathen:
you're going to get DQ'd because of the text...shame, because this is a solid shot

Charley Victoria
by neolestat

Comment by ShutterPug:
nice bokeh - too bad the tet is there

Angel in the Graveyard
by neolestat

Comment by pix-are:

Originally posted by BradP: 4.2 You will not use the DPChallenge.com Service to post content or to design, manufacture, market or sell a Product that (i) infringes the rights of a third party, including, without limitation, copyrights, trademarks, patents, trade secrets, rights of privacy and publicity, (ii) is libelous, defamatory or slanderous, (iii) condones, promotes, contains or links to warez, cracks, hacks or similar utilities or programs, (iv) contains explicitly sexual content, (v) does or may denigrate or offend any ethnic, racial, gender, religious or other protected group, through use of language, images, stereotypical depiction or otherwise, (vi) is designed to or does harass, threaten, defame or abuse others, (vii) exploits images or the likeness of minors, (viii) encourages the use of drugs or the under-age use of alcohol or cigarettes or (ix) is generally offensive or in bad taste. Nothing personal, but I feel this image falls under both bold-text areas above, or in the case of the explicit part, it is strongly implied and suggestive of a sexual act in general. Edit to add: I echo Judy's statement above and am in no way a prude either. This image, in my opinion does cross the line. Crop the bottom so her fingers aren't actually being shown in her panties and all should be fine.

Are you kidding me? There's MUCH, MUCH worse on this site. This is tame and a matter of opinion but if you're going to complain about something as mild as this stop being choosy and start complaining about all the others. I won't mention names but I'm sure you can figure out the other questionable pics. So how about we talk about the quality of the pic, not the content. Personally, I find half the shitty vacation photos, OOF, and pet photos more insulting and offensive than this photo!! If you don't like it, DON'T LOOK AT IT!!

Octopussy
by neolestat

Comment by Kronus:
James Bond would be proud, You know when its good. Some would say don,t be creative, conform, be like us cows, Cows uncreative cows, I say Bull be a bull and fu#$@ the cows

Angel in the Graveyard
by neolestat

Comment by Kronus:
this is done tastefully and a great capyure as well

Octopussy
by neolestat

Comment by larry595:
You should do one with the octopus censoring the rectum. You could call it "Octobuttcrack".

Why does this image provocate the "fine line between porn and art" debate. Do they consider the image bestiality?

Porn is art.

Octopussy
by neolestat

Comment by Brad:
didn't need to be said - just ignore me.

Message edited by author 2006-10-19 04:14:35.

Octopussy
by neolestat

Comment by keithborg:
Photography is an art in itself, of course you're not offending me. Well done for being different my friend, hope to see more original images from you.