Image |
Comment |
| 12/05/2005 05:33:12 PM |
Am I in focus ?by airdanceComment by Sammie: Nice picture - a tiny bit over exposed on the face. I really wish the whole beak was in the picture. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 12/05/2005 12:51:36 PM |
Am I in focus ?by airdanceComment by cpurser: IMO, a little overexposed. Also, I would have put his eye in the upper-right third of the frame. But good focus :-) |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 12/04/2005 06:58:15 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 12/04/2005 06:18:51 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 12/04/2005 05:46:43 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 12/02/2005 08:58:16 PM |
Am I in focus ?by airdanceComment by tfaust: I think this is an excellent subject matter. My criticism: the sunny area of the photo is pretty hot - seems a bit overexposed, however there is still plenty of detail left in the skin under the beak. I would also prefer to see either less of the beak and more of the head or the entire beak. Having said that, It is possible to have this much of the beak showing, but maybe with a different composition, possibly having him higher on the right frame bringing the eye down to the left while following the beak. I know you can't pose these critters though, amd waiting for the opportune shot could get long! |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 12/02/2005 08:23:00 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 12/01/2005 11:05:02 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 12/01/2005 05:53:10 AM |
Am I in focus ?by airdanceComment by macrothing: 6 - Yes you are, mostly. Criticism; even more detail would make this better in my opinion. A little 'blown', but that pale pink coloring against such a dark background likely makes contrast control difficult. In my opinion, if there was only one bird, the centered composition would have worked better, but with the two in the background, maybe more space, probably on the left (given the lighter variation of water(?) on the right), may have also made this better. Of course the beak 'cut' is obvious, on that I think that either an even tighter cropping on the head, or else incorporating the entire beak, dependent of course what you had to work with. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 12/01/2005 01:43:05 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 10/04/2025 03:04:13 PM EDT.