Image |
Comment |
| 06/16/2003 01:51:19 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/16/2003 12:57:53 AM |
Praying Mantis by LarsPaysenComment by progersct: Oh dear! I'm looking at this right before going to bed. Maybe its just a gummy candy. Yeah, that's it. I gave it a 9. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/15/2003 03:54:34 PM |
Mushroom Newsby LarsPaysenComment by RiderGal: Thats a crazy looking mushroom! Mushroom News? is there really a Mushroom News magazine? hehehehe... Nice DOF on this photo. I wonder though whether there would be enough room for type at the top... I think it wouldn't be too much of a problem though. I think this photo is well done and would definitely fit for the said magazine. Don't care for the border, not sure that most magazines have borders... thats just me though. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/15/2003 02:59:39 PM |
Mushroom Newsby LarsPaysenComment by CLarson557: I was wondering if it this would be more appropriate for the magazine if the top of the mushroom was further down to make way for the title. Reguardless, this is a real nice photo and well done. The focus and DOF are great. I like the detail shown here. 9 Good luck in the challenge. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/13/2003 01:08:09 AM |
|
| 06/12/2003 11:30:28 PM |
|
| 06/11/2003 08:28:34 PM |
Mushroom Newsby LarsPaysenComment by qachyk: Mushroom News... heh, whaddya know, it really exists. (No offense, I just had to check; I would have suggested Mycologia instead otherwise.)
Fits the magazine topic just fine. Maybe a little busy of a background for easy text laoyout but only becaues of the pale patches, and it's probably workable with. A close-up shot on what appears to be damage could easily go with a cover story. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/11/2003 01:06:59 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/11/2003 12:59:18 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/11/2003 11:28:00 AM |
Mushroom Newsby LarsPaysenComment by gaja_tz: maybe you should be using smaller aperture to get more sharper iamge. In this case it looks like you focused on the 2 holeson the "hat". = 3 |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/01/2025 11:00:50 PM EDT.