Our Hope for the Future
by PhantomEWO

Comment by saracat:
Beautiful colors and gorgeous skin tones, but the crop feels a little too tight. I think a slightly wider crop (even keeping it square) would work better as it wouldn't feel so 'aggressive'.

Our Hope for the Future
by PhantomEWO

Comment by SandyP:
Ohmygoodness! My heart melted into mush the minute I saw this!!! What a BEAUTIFUL portrait! This could not be more perfect. You have so captured her little personality. What a CUTIE! 10++++

Just Happy to be Here
by PhantomEWO

Comment by Jutilda:
Those little monkeys always look so mad. I was taking pics at a zoo and one reached through the grate and yanked out a hunk of my hair. ROFL

Our Hope for the Future
by PhantomEWO

Comment by Jutilda:
Oh my!! What a happy face. Something about the position and all the wrinkles of her shirt. I wish she had on no shirt and it was just sweet baby skin and the sparkle of that single earring and those eyes!!

Just Happy to be Here
by PhantomEWO

Comment by undieyatch:
.....some what soft hand/paws, but seems to work with inclusion of the cage bars...... like the tire halo in the background. Piercing eyes on this fellow are great.

Bishop's Walk
by PhantomEWO

Comment by SandyP:
NO way should this be 5.2!!! This is gorgeous!!! I love this photo. It just radiates history in those old stone walls!

Bishop's Walk
by PhantomEWO

Comment by TheresaA:
Don, This is such an amazing photo. The angle you took this from is fantastic. I love it, wish I would of thought of it. I'm sorry I missed this picture while voting.

16-Feb-06-f32-DPC-DUST-0014.jpg
by PhantomEWO

Comment by arlanbart:
The border's a little distracting. :)

Bishop's Walk
by PhantomEWO

Comment by stef57:
good angle.. very nice

Bishop's Walk
by PhantomEWO

Comment by yanko:
This is a very odd photo for me. I'm more of a high contrast type of guy but the level of contrast here doesn't really bother me. Nor does the color, which works. Also the detail is good. What I find odd is the photo, for a lack of a better word, is in conflict. There is such a prominent dividing line in this photograph that it makes it a little hard on the eyes at least for me. Maybe if there was some meaning behind that it would work but for me I don't see one. Maybe if you shot at a lower angle you could have shown some separation in the arches?