Image |
Comment |
| 11/05/2012 11:43:05 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 11/05/2012 08:11:59 AM |
M&Ms... mmmmmmmsssssby MEJazzComment by giantmike: Seems like this photo is less about the food, and more about the kid. Not necessarily bad, but the hand movement subtracts in my opinion. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 11/02/2012 10:04:25 PM |
Silence is Goldenby MEJazzComment by MEJazz: I agree that the off-focus hurt the score - A LOT! i was too lazy to re-take the shot, just cropped and used what i shot earlier. The tight crop revealed the focus offset that was not apparent in the full image. Message edited by author 2012-11-02 23:29:32. |
| 11/02/2012 11:43:42 AM |
Silence is Goldenby MEJazzComment by bobnospum: I can only assume such a low score is from the "you took a picture on someone else's art" crowd. I like the way you cropped the angel. Nice lighting and shadows. Slightly out of focus on the eyes may also have hurt you here. The DOF is great just needed to move the focus point a bit. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 10/24/2012 06:02:52 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 10/24/2012 03:21:05 AM |
|
| 08/14/2012 01:36:52 PM |
Evening Gooseby MEJazzComment by FrankRobinson: Hi Mansoor, welcome to the Critique Zone!
Clearly this shot left the voters a little cold - I guess the question is why? (noting that all of this is subjective - so I hope some of it is of interest)
Technically: This is a tricky one - it is fairly sharp around the back end, but doesn't seem so sharp around the head and eyes, the traditional focal point. I suspect that this is a result of your really large aperture (f2) and a fairly small Depth of Field. Personally, with a 5DII, I would be happy going to about ISO 800, allowing an aperture of at least f7.1 without compromising your shutter speed. That would probably give you razor sharp bum and head, with room for manouevre.
Artistically: It's really a taste issue, so this is just my opinion. I think that it needs to be cropped differently: either with the scale as you have it but the goose to the bottom left, giving it 'space to move into', or with a tighter crop. As it is, the goose is just too central in a vast expanse of space. I would also recommend trying to find a different perspective - in life, we look down at stuff like geese (physically!) so a photo which does the same lacks impact - perhaps vertically down (difficult) or from on a level, or even up at the goose? Something to shock the eye and show something different. Just my thoughts.
Anyway, I hope that there was something in there of use!
Happy hunting,
Frank. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 08/07/2012 05:46:21 PM |
Evening Gooseby MEJazzComment by tjbel05: The swirls in the water are interesting. I like the water droplet on the beak of the goose. I am not crazy about the crop. I would have come in a little tighter to the back and bottom. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 07/22/2012 09:02:54 AM |
Gears & Springsby MEJazzComment by bsluijk: Composition Is confusing, with the hands in the way, and the copper piece very centric I get no clues where and how to look. Is the image about the black screw? |
| 07/16/2012 11:42:45 PM |
Gears & Springsby MEJazzComment by Cory: Swirls and whirls, gears and screws, these are the parts that watchmakers use.
Seriously though, not a bad shot, yet it leaves me wanting more DOF, and more noise reduction. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/17/2025 07:52:49 PM EDT.