Into the Fire
by The_Itinerant

Comment by hajeka:
Looks dangerous, but a nice fire photo.

Into the Fire
by The_Itinerant

Comment by andrewt:
lack of crispness weakens this shot.

Into the Fire
by The_Itinerant

Comment by Ter:
pity the firefighters werent that bit sharper

Into the Fire
by The_Itinerant

Comment by Nuzzer:
Don't take this the wrong way but as I see DPC as a learning experience here is my frank critique:

This comes across as a snapshot. By that I mean that I feel that anybody standing where you were with a camera could have gone click and got this result. I think a photographer should aim to do more than that. I may be wrong and perhaps you do have more of a story to your shot but the fact is that it doesn't come across to the viewer.

As an example, if you were in Paris and saw the Eiffel Tower you could hold the camera and go click. You'd have a shot that millions of other tourists have and would be good as a record of your holiday. I think at DPC you need more than that. You need to consider the POV - make it something that enhances the tower (include a flowerbed or kissing couple in the foreground), make use of lighting (dusk for shadows), composition (maybe include the buildings beside it to get a sense of scale).

I hope this helps and please don't be offended, I'm only offering an opinion.

Into the Fire
by The_Itinerant

Comment by KarenNfld:
A good photojournalism shot but a bit grainy.

Into the Fire
by The_Itinerant

Comment by dtremain:
That looks hot!

Into the Fire
by The_Itinerant

Comment by popdeepop:
Fuzzy. So much light and so little to use.

Into the Fire
by The_Itinerant

Comment by Omni:
too poor image quality

Into the Fire
by The_Itinerant

Comment by tanguera:
A frightening scene.

Into the Fire
by The_Itinerant

Comment by barbaraanne:
A picture with interest, it tells a story...good shot