| Image |
Comment |
| 08/17/2005 09:10:46 PM |
beach-grass-wide-IMG_0370.jpgby Bear_MusicComment by BeeGee: Nice shots, Robert. I have to agree with the others and I love my 10-22, too. What a Alienyst and Justin don't seem to realize is that the DOF automatically grows to enormous depths with an extremely short focal length. That's why compact digital cameras with a short zoom fail to produce even the faintest touch of OOF back- or foreground (except maybe in macro mode or fully zoomed to the tele end with a huge difference in distance between lens and subject and lens and fore- or background respectively). The Fuji 602 I used before I got my 20D was the equivalent of a 35-210 but the focal length of the lens was something like a 6 to 36 and it was only at the full tele end that you could make a little use of DOF as a creative element in your pictures. Now with the 10-22 it's similar, i.e. you can hardly get OOF elements in your picture, even when the lens is wide open, BECAUSE the short focal length doesn't allow for anything but huge DOF.
Sorry if I sound preachy here, was just wondering if people realize that the DOF is practically out of the photographer's control when it comes to using a 10mm lens.
Cheers,
Bruno |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 08/17/2005 08:25:00 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 08/17/2005 02:57:06 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 08/17/2005 12:41:36 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 08/17/2005 11:33:58 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 08/17/2005 01:10:11 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 08/16/2005 12:14:36 AM |
1977by Bear_MusicComment by Emilio: As a collector of antique cameras, I enjoy this picture. I wouldn't call it a winner but it makes me smile and that's enough for me. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 08/15/2005 11:02:32 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 08/15/2005 10:49:58 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 08/15/2005 04:08:13 PM |
Condo-Minimumby Bear_MusicComment by Bear_Music: Thanks to all who have "defended" my whimsical "illusion of scale", and understood that it is a thought-out image, not a stuffed-in one. It's not in my nature to do "set-ups"; I photograph what I see, only very rarely creating something for the purposes of a challenge. I sometimes arrange things (like peppers and cilantro, or a sculpture in a refrigerator) but can't recall offhand ever having created an entire shot for DPC.
I too was mildly suprised this didn't do a bit better; I thought it was an interesting "illusion" and a creative one. But so it goes.
As for those who commented negatively on the "noise", there IS NO NOISE IN THIS SHOT! That's blue metalflake paint... I have seen few better examples than this shot of the absurd, knee-jerk reaction against "noise" in DPC... Geesh... Better not photograph metalflake paint any more, it's too noisy...
Robt. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 12/21/2025 07:22:56 PM EST.