Silence in Tuscany
by srugolo

Comment by MAK:
DAMN! when did you sneak back in... sorry this finished so low, you know by now that DPC is EYECANDY

Glad to see you back friend.. ciao

Silence in Tuscany
by srugolo

Comment by alexzen:
Beautiful, but.... There is too much natural light and more than one source.

Silence in Tuscany
by srugolo

Comment by tano_gooch:
Pretty neat, but looks like a lot of light sources to me ...

Silence in Tuscany
by srugolo

Comment by CarpeLumen:
.... wouldnt this be multiple light souces?

Silence in Tuscany
by srugolo

Comment by photom1946:
great photo, but is star light artifical light source?? still i can go with a 5, but higher if you followed the rules...

Silence in Tuscany
by srugolo

Comment by shafferlake:
more than one light source

Silence in Tuscany
by srugolo

Comment by ZeppKash:
single, ARTIFICIAL light source. DNMC

Silence in Tuscany
by srugolo

Comment by david_c:
Well, I love the image, but I think the challenge called for a single, artifical light source.

Silence in Tuscany
by srugolo

Comment by signal2noise:
I don't thinks this qualifies for SLS. While the shrub is well-lit from the front, the stars, the multiple street/house lights and the glow beyond the horizon are all additional sources.

Silence in Tuscany
by srugolo

Comment by senor_kasper:
Difficult to judge your take on the challenge. First, I must say this is stunningly beautiful image and I congratulate you on it. I suppose you could argue that most of the frame is iluminated by what remains of sunlight or perhaps moonlight, but, you have at least one other source in the city lights, and, most of all, you have numerous sources of light coming from the stars; technically, each star would be a source of light. I would have given this image a 9 in some other challenge (free study? landscape? Tree?) but I feel it would be unfair to the other entries to do so here.