Image |
Comment |
| 03/22/2006 06:28:45 PM |
|
| 03/21/2006 07:41:56 PM |
2h:07m:09sby NodeComment by rwouthuis: This doesn't look like a 2 second exposure to me. I would have expected some motion in the shot. |
| 03/21/2006 02:09:47 PM |
2h:07m:09sby NodeComment by wheeledd: Yet another second hand. This one doesn't even show the motion of the second hand. How can it be a 2-second exposure? |
| 03/21/2006 09:15:52 AM |
2h:07m:09sby NodeComment by BakerBug: If this were a two second exposure, shouldn't the second hand have moved at some point? Other shots in this challenge seemd to have captured the movement. I do like the lighting and it is a good crisp shot. |
| 03/21/2006 01:52:01 AM |
|
| 03/20/2006 08:29:18 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 03/20/2006 07:19:46 AM |
2h:07m:09sby NodeComment by ClickNSee: there's something about a long exposure that really seems to bring out the richness of an image. This is awesome! |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 03/04/2006 09:03:08 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 03/04/2006 12:47:01 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 03/03/2006 06:10:13 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 06/20/2025 07:40:53 AM EDT.