200 times every week . . .
by phraid2002

Comment by phraid69:
How did you rate that picture? Very original idea! The finish makes it look like a Monitor screen. It would have been nice to see more of the screen

200 times every week . . .
by phraid2002

Comment by faithriko:
Good Idea! For me, one of the picture that fit better the challenge! But what is it the black stain in the bottom? I don't like it too much. -6-!

200 times every week . . .
by phraid2002

Comment by aznym:
Nice idea, not a brilliant picture.

200 times every week . . .
by phraid2002

Comment by KiwiChris:
I'm amazed this is the only one of these so far :-).

Money laundering
by phraid2002

Comment by labuds:
Go Canada!

Money laundering
by phraid2002

Comment by Glen King:
Good idea, but I don't think it's exactly what they had in mind.

Money laundering
by phraid2002

Comment by dasturias:
haha, i have to admit it was a clever title, however, i don't feel as if really captures serendipity. One can imagine how it COULD be, however it's not clearly demonstrated in the photo. Maybe with less money and not so evenly spread out, so it would seem more nateral, and staged shot. I give it a 5 (avg)

Money laundering
by phraid2002

Comment by Go-KL:
I love the title and I think the image is quite well taken, the washing maching white bit (Sorry not familiar with layout of canadian washers!) is quite distracting but I suppose necessary to show it is a washing machine. The problem I have is deciding whether this is serendipity. If you have discovered the notes by accident then yes, if you have washed your hard earned cash and possibly ruined it then no.
I will give you the benefit of the doubt and go for the latter!

Money laundering
by phraid2002

Comment by Zoomdak:
Top of the turn cycle is overexposed (taken with flash?). Interesting idea though.

Money laundering
by phraid2002

Comment by Artifacts:
Great concept but the agitator top being the brightest object in the frame and out of focus is a distraction that hurts this image. Greater depth of field is all it needs.