Image |
Comment |
| 09/16/2002 04:04:00 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 09/16/2002 02:42:00 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 09/16/2002 11:57:00 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 09/16/2002 11:48:00 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 09/16/2002 09:04:00 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 09/16/2002 01:39:00 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 09/06/2002 10:55:00 AM |
|
| 09/05/2002 09:39:00 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 09/05/2002 02:30:00 PM |
The Five Second Spectacularby just-marriedComment by sjgleah: Obviously this is, strictly speaking, a candid shot. And it is nicely done, technically. What keeps me from scoring it highly it is that the image would essentially be the same if the subject knew that you and the camera were there or not. The subject is there to be looked at and (potentially) photographed, so the "candid" nature of it dimnishes in my eyes. An example of "candid" that I'd like better in this context would be an image of spectators enjoying the performance.4 sjgleah |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 09/03/2002 07:52:00 PM |
The Five Second Spectacularby just-marriedComment by autool: Composition: Subject Placement, Cropping, Background6, Technical: Focus, Exposure, Lighting, Processing6, Appeal: Is it Interesting, Motivating, Etc.? 5, Total Averaged Rating6. Autool |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/13/2025 12:43:29 AM EDT.