|
|
Showing 3701 - 3710 of ~4392 |
Image |
Comment |
| 04/29/2004 12:40:08 PM | Meal-to-Goby labudsComment by fe11: such a nice photo - why the border - it works in groundung the negative space, although i'm not sure that is necessary, but is distracting in the upper left corner. |
| 04/29/2004 04:37:44 AM | |
| 04/28/2004 08:05:53 PM | |
| 04/28/2004 03:10:48 PM | X-Rays (Accidentally Discovered in 1895) by labudsComment by GeneralE: Copied from a forum post:
Originally posted by labuda: Originally posted by breckinshire: Originally posted by txaggie90: I'm curious how the "X-Ray" photo was done within the rules. I was surprised that it was actually marked as verified. |
I agree, I was surprised by that as well. I'd be interested to hear how it was done within the rules. |
Funny that you ask... I'll post a tutorial about it this week :) |
If ONLY this had been under the advanced rule set, you might have just been pushing the new boundaries to their limit to have maneuvered the two distal phalanges indicis downwards just a bit ... |
| 04/28/2004 02:16:32 PM | |
| 04/28/2004 01:10:12 PM | |
| 04/28/2004 01:02:17 PM | Meal-to-Goby labudsComment by autool: Composition: Subject Placement, Cropping, Background 5
Technical: Focus, Exposure, Lighting, Processing 7
Appeal: Is it Interesting, Motivating, Etc.? 3
How well does it meet the challenge: 5
Total Averaged Rating 5 Autool
|
| 04/28/2004 11:51:43 AM | Meal-to-Goby labudsComment by jodiecoston: Great shot! Excellent composition, creative take on the challenge theme. 10
ps - I'd love it if you could pm me and tell me where you got those!!! |
| 04/28/2004 10:59:15 AM | X-Rays (Accidentally Discovered in 1895) by labudsComment by justine: After reading some of the comments below...... a reminder.
With valid reason, you may suggest an image for disqualification by clicking the "Recommend Disqualification for this Picture" link under the challenge image. Possible reasons for disqualification are:
The photograph has hints of alteration in ways outside of those allowed on DPChallenge.
You have proof the photograph was not taken by the photographer who submitted it to the challenge.
You have proof the photograph was not taken within the required dates.
In all cases, do not let this request for disqualification affect your score for the photograph. Please vote on the photo as if the entry is legal, and let the administrators do the rest. Requests for disqualification will be reviewed by DPChallenge. If your image is disqualified, you will be sent an e-mail stating the reason why, and you will also be be notified on your home page. Your image will no longer be available for voting/commenting.
|
| 04/28/2004 09:27:17 AM | X-Rays (Accidentally Discovered in 1895) by labudsComment by Quadrajet: Great work, very creative.
By "double exposure" the photograper means, exposing two subjects in the same frame, not opening the shutter twice.
It's really very simple if you think about it. By holding a piece of paper/cardboard directly over the lens, one half of the CCD doesn't receive any light, then after reaching the proper exposure with one side, you slide the cardboard over and expose the yet to be exposed side.
If you simply think out of the box, you'll get it.
Again, excellent work. |
|
Showing 3701 - 3710 of ~4392 |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/10/2025 04:11:57 PM EDT.
|