DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 
Browse Settings
Currently viewing:
Registered UserSchuff

Show comments:

Per page:

Order:

Comments:


Comments Received by Schuff
Pages:   ... ... [60]
Showing 371 - 380 of ~599
Image Comment
Heart of the Hibiscus (Branching Corolla)
09/19/2005 05:59:20 AM
Heart of the Hibiscus (Branching Corolla)
by Schuff

Comment by Matthew:
Critique Club

Hello from the Critique Club!

This is an interesting idea, and I like the idea behind it. One of the problems with a slightly unusual take on a challenge is that you will occasionally get marked down for it - not that it should be a reason not to post interesting takes on a challenge (sometimes you will get it just right!).

Technically, there are a few issues.

Compositionally, you have gone for an interesting composition, which I think works partially. I like the stamen from the corner: it provides a strong leading line to the detailed area of interest. However, there is no reason for the eye to travel to the LHS of the picture; I would be tempted to crop to a squarer image with lesson the left, or to include more interest on the LHS.

That brings me to the Depth of Field. You have chosen a very shallow DoF, which menas that most of the stamen, and all of the detail on the petals is out of focus. The base of the stamen is in focus, and this is the subject of your entry. On the one hand, the shallow DoF draws the attention of the viewer to the point of your image: the branch. However, it also leaves the viewers attention in the one place, which makes for a slightly unsatisfying viewing experience. I think that the image would benefit from a lot deeper DoF. You can achieve this with the same photograph by choosing a much narrower aperture. You have chosen F-4.0 - an F-16 or F-22 would bring much more of the flower into focus. It would add detail into the petal on the LHS and provide the viewer with more to look at, improving the composition of the image at the same time. You would also have more detail in the stamen, adding more interest to that area.

In order to obtain a good image using a higher F-number, you would also need to think hard about lighting. The shutter speed will be slower (the aperture is smaller, the amount of light getting through the lens smaller). You will need to make sure that the subject is bright, and that you are holding the camera steady (tripod?). If you cannot get everything bright enough, then you have the option of increasing your ISO (your camera will happily take photos at ISO 400 or 800 without noticeable degradation of quality).

Here, there is a strong shadow on the bottom RHS (careful when using flash of the shadow cast by your lens!) and the detail in the stamen is burnt out. I think that I can spot a technical problem that will have caused this.

The problem stems from the fact that you appear (from the nature of the reflections) to have used the flash. The following is only relevant if this is in fact the case (ignore if you did not!). I guess that you were using the camera in Av mode, and had set the Av to 4.0 and popped the flash manually. If I am right, I guess that the image would have been too light overall (and obscured the detail in the bright stamen), which is the reason why you had to adjust contrast and brightness.

The reason for the lightness occurring (and why this is a technical fault) is that your camera has a maximum flash synchronisation shutter speed of 1/250. That means that when using the flash, the shutter cannot travel at a speed greater than 1/250 (or it might miss the point at which the flash fires). Your shutter speed for the image is stated to be 1/500. In fact, I think that your shutter was operating at 1/250 (the technical limitation of the camera when using flash) at a time when the brightness of the image dictated that the shutter be open for half that time (1/500). It was therefore, in fact, open for twice the correct length of time, over exposing your image. This means that the highlights ghet burned out and the whole image loses out.

The way to avoid this is to make sure that the camera does not exceed a shutter speed of 1/250 when using the flash. You can do this by being careful in Av mode, or by using Tv mode and setting the shutter speed to 1/250 at the fastest.

Good luck with the next challenge!

Matthew
Photographer found comment helpful.
Bubbles? My Bubbles!
09/18/2005 09:11:08 PM
Bubbles? My Bubbles!
by Schuff

Comment by admart01:
honest, sweet, bubbles are a wonderful element. one of my favorites this challenge
Photographer found comment helpful.
Eye Am Watching You
09/18/2005 07:18:47 PM
Eye Am Watching You
by Schuff

Comment by Schuff:
Thank you for the comments mavrik!
Bubbles? My Bubbles!
09/18/2005 12:29:06 PM
Bubbles? My Bubbles!
by Schuff

Comment by GeneralE:
I think I'd prefer having the subject "look into" the frame would work better; the bubbles can be "escaping out the top instead of the side. But I know there might not have been anything on that side for this particular shot, which does have great expression.
Photographer found comment helpful.
Eye Am Watching You
09/17/2005 09:31:45 PM
Eye Am Watching You
by Schuff

Comment by wewillexplore:
Greetings from the Critique Club

I agree with some of your commentors and disagree with some. I think the eye should be in focus - absolutely. In a macro, I want detail. I want to see things that I can't normally see.

The high contrast is evident - but actually a main portion of this image turns out to be the shadow under the eyebrow and that's got great middle exposure. I know the white skin and black hairs are supposed to be the contrast, but watch what the rest of the shot does as well.

Good composition, nice subject. Just nail focus next time.
Photographer found comment helpful.
Bubbles? My Bubbles!
09/17/2005 08:54:29 PM
Bubbles? My Bubbles!
by Schuff

Comment by thomaspeople:
Great capture, especially the bubble on the nose. Maybe a little too dark, but not much.
Photographer found comment helpful.
Bubbles? My Bubbles!
09/17/2005 12:12:07 PM
Bubbles? My Bubbles!
by Schuff

Comment by Louison:
Ah, a two-in-one, hugh? Very good lighting and composition. This is good!
Photographer found comment helpful.
Bubbles? My Bubbles!
09/17/2005 05:45:53 AM
Bubbles? My Bubbles!
by Schuff

Comment by yanko:
Cute.
Photographer found comment helpful.
Bubbles? My Bubbles!
09/17/2005 01:00:12 AM
Bubbles? My Bubbles!
by Schuff

Comment by briantammy:
kids have such beautiful eyes
Photographer found comment helpful.
Bubbles? My Bubbles!
09/17/2005 12:29:46 AM
Bubbles? My Bubbles!
by Schuff

Comment by neophyte:
Perect comp, shadows and lighting. Great eyes too! 10
Photographer found comment helpful.
Pages:   ... ... [60]
Showing 371 - 380 of ~599


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/05/2025 04:07:40 AM EDT.