Shadows Of The Past
by Homunculus

Comment by Trinch:
I had to do a double take on this one. Those are staples aren't there? ;) Very well done and a nice concept too. Never forget.

Shadows Of The Past
by Homunculus

Comment by Konador:
Clever setup, nice photo. 8.

Shadows Of The Past
by Homunculus

Comment by bruski:
Excellent image. Took me a minute to realize that the buildings were staples. I actually looked at this image skipped to the next one and then was like, wait a minute. I went back and then saw that it was the twin towers but they weren't with the main part of the city. I think the only reason it eventually caught my attention was the red light. I like the composition and both the shadows and the reflections really add to the image. It is a very different but pleasing way to show tribute to 9/11. Nice work.

Shadows Of The Past
by Homunculus

Comment by alanfreed:
What an interesting setup! Very impressive, and certainly one of the most creative uses of office supplies I have seen in a long time :) - 9

Shadows Of The Past
by Homunculus

Comment by shutterfly:
This is amazing, i bet it took a long time to get it right and it looks perfect.

Shadows Of The Past
by Homunculus

Comment by justine:
OOOOooooh my gosh what a clever, unique idea. Staples right?!!! Outstanding. Must of take a long time to set up. Great going. The laser light is such a good touch.
WOW. I am in awe!

Shadows Of The Past
by Homunculus

Comment by jas0420:
Somebody has too much free time! :) Incredibly creative shot!! I like the laser pointer idea too... Nice job!

Shadows Of The Past
by Homunculus

Comment by Natator:
Spotted the intention immediately, but took me a moment to realise what you used to achieve it. Clever idea :)

Shadows Of The Past
by Homunculus

Comment by Firstrich1:
You put alot of work in this:) Very original idea. Good luck.8

Message edited by author 2003-11-03 00:13:29.

Shadows Of The Past
by Homunculus

Comment by Koriyama:
great idea here. very imaginative. the shadows to the front of the staples could have been used more effectively, though