Are Those Really Your Teeth?
by Barroness

Comment by bjoern:
Hilarious!

Are Those Really Your Teeth?
by Barroness

Comment by Lydia:
Hahahaha!
Brilliant, Debbi!

Message edited by author 2025-06-20 14:55:45.

Are Those Really Your Teeth?
by Barroness

Comment by Refocused:
That is so funny!!! His buddy doesn't seem to know what to make of it:)

Are Those Really Your Teeth?
by Barroness

Comment by primabarbara:
I love this - was one of my highest votes.
Fits perfectly

Are Those Really Your Teeth?
by Barroness

Comment by bobnospum:
One of my top picks. Good doggies. I laughed out loud when I saw this. The 2nd dog really add to the image.

Row
by Barroness

Comment by JulietNN:
This is just my opinion, but using the filter is fine, but if you use it I would do it delicately and boost up the contrast, it will make a world of difference to your water depths, and again on your any and trees , masking off those three areas and brining delicate but more or less pronounced would give you the floaty wispy feel and not just one overall filter look Just my 2 cents xox

Row
by Barroness

Comment by mariuca:
Since I seldom mark an image with a 4, I think I have to say why.
Personally, I dislike profoundly these types of filter and I do not think they belong to an artistic photography.

Huntress
by Barroness

Comment by Lydia:
Nicely caught, Debbi!

Untitled
by Barroness

Comment by bobnospum:
Nice portrait. I am not sure it really works as a negative. Us old film users saw images like this for decades on our negatives. Perhaps having a more detailed background or a pattern on his shirt would give it more impact.

Row
by Barroness

Comment by posthumous:
I like the composition, with the emptiness at the bottom of the image. The filter ruins it, though. Protect your art from filters!