| Image |
Comment |
| 02/21/2008 08:52:11 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 02/20/2008 11:06:44 PM |
|
| 02/20/2008 11:05:47 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 02/11/2008 10:09:09 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 02/11/2008 03:34:17 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 02/10/2008 11:39:33 PM |
Dawnby jmritzComment by HighNooner: Two days before the new luner month. A very short memory I say 10 any way |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 02/10/2008 08:48:19 AM |
Cardinal by jmritzComment by zxaar: OOOOOOOO, the blur has killed it. Could have been a good photo but the blur. I am not sure if it was intensional but it does not gel well with DPC crowd. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 02/09/2008 01:15:12 AM |
Cardinal by jmritzComment by Zoomdak: Nice picture of a cardinal (and I love cardinals). Doesn't quite have the technical aspects and wow factor DPC likes though. First off, yeah, the image is relatively sharp, but not tack sharp. The composition is well, sorry to say, kind of boring. It is all centered. My eye is immediately drawn to the eye of the bird, but there isn't much to look at after that. I would like to see a little bit deeper DOF, but it looks like that'd be hard to do with this bird and those lighting conditions. Still, impressively close shot of a cardinal. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 02/08/2008 08:50:08 PM |
Cardinal by jmritzComment by Yo_Spiff: I don't think out of focus or dpeth of field was really the problem. Though his eye is nice and sharp, the beak looks like there was some motion blur going on. I the beak were as clear as the area behind it, I don't think the rest of it would have been as big a problem, but my eye is drawn to the blurry beak. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 02/08/2008 08:18:54 PM |
Cardinal by jmritzComment by MaryO: You're right, the eye is sharp, but the beak isn't. He could have been in mid-chew; at f/8 it shouldn't be a DOF issue. I think people expect the eye and beak to have the same amount of sharpness since they're usually the same distance from the lens, and either one being soft loses you points. Plus there's the added factor that some voters were probably tired of birds by the time they got to yours!
I really like his position in the image and the eye contact is pretty darned cool. You really did get phenomenal detail in that eyeball. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2026 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 05/10/2026 12:13:05 PM EDT.