Image |
Comment |
| 01/09/2012 10:41:05 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/09/2012 03:02:26 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/09/2012 01:15:50 AM |
It's in the catchlightsby AllenPComment by AllenP: Originally posted by adigitalromance: I do love the processing and lighting in this. It's almost impossible to imagine doing this without a softbox. Is it possible?? (I don't own one.) I had a similar idea, but didn't do it for lack of time. I wanted a heavier sharpened look, close up and intimate like yours, and a lot more gritty. Therefore, I'm curious as to the post-processing of this. |
Yes, definitely possible doing this without a softbox however the light needs to be super soft, maybe on a cloudy day or standing far enough from a window (and facing it) to use that soft, diffused light coming in through the window. You will not have this kind of catchlights without the softbox however (perhaps windowed shape catchlights if you are using the window light) and achieving a pitch black background with only ambient lighting might be challenging but certainly doable (if that is important to you). Having a monster-size softbox like the 74" Octa will give you a consistently super-soft light with tons of details on the face while maintaining a low ISO on the camera which is the advantage it may have over say when you do it through window light indoors. If you want virtually noise-free and sharp image specially in the eyes, it may be a little difficult to achieve it through a diffused, soft window light but should be a lot easier on a cloudy day outdoors with enough day light. The 74" Elinchrom Octa will give you one of the most incredibly soft artificial (but natural looking) lights in the world. Doing an effective dodge and burn in post is very important too. Message edited by author 2012-01-09 12:08:37. |
| 01/09/2012 01:05:31 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/09/2012 12:15:45 AM |
It's in the catchlightsby AllenPComment by adigitalromance: I do love the processing and lighting in this. It's almost impossible to imagine doing this without a softbox. Is it possible?? (I don't own one.) I had a similar idea, but didn't do it for lack of time. I wanted a heavier sharpened look, close up and intimate like yours, and a lot more gritty. Therefore, I'm curious as to the post-processing of this. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/09/2012 12:10:44 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/09/2012 12:03:34 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/08/2012 10:27:23 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/08/2012 10:04:12 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/08/2012 08:54:26 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/18/2025 09:12:54 PM EDT.