| Image |
Comment |
| 05/04/2014 04:12:42 AM |
Six degrees of separationby Alex_PetriniComment by Alex_Petrini: Originally posted by Neat: I'm not sure if anyone else can see this, but I see all these blotchy marks like some serious banding around the left egg, is it my monitor or not, not sure?? |
I can see no banding (checked on 2 computers, one phone and one tablet). If you mean what is visible on the left, that is just the out or focus area. Anyways this was minimal, so no way to fix any kind of issues :) |
| 05/03/2014 06:29:31 AM |
Six degrees of separationby Alex_PetriniComment by Neat: I'm not sure if anyone else can see this, but I see all these blotchy marks like some serious banding around the left egg, is it my monitor or not, not sure?? |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/03/2014 12:37:22 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/02/2014 05:40:28 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/02/2014 11:28:21 AM |
Red night by Alex_PetriniComment by HarveyG: "If your weather and location cooperate, shoot the total eclipse of the moon."
I must say I'm disappointed Alex.
You're weather cooperated but your location did not. This is not a question of bending the rules (or even the perceived lack of understanding/grey area of the description), art, artistry and later justification of DMC/DNMC and Forum Fights, but your integrity. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/02/2014 09:30:34 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/02/2014 01:45:11 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/01/2014 10:50:01 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/01/2014 09:23:40 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/01/2014 01:10:10 PM |
Red night by Alex_PetriniComment by tome: Originally posted by hahn23: Doesn't look like any total lunar eclipse I've ever seen. And, I've seen a few and photographed several. How about you? Voters were deceived. |
Amateur astronomer for 35 years here. Naturally, I've seen many eclipses and this could definitely look like one, with some added processing for fanciness. In fact, your image, which I rated higher because you included context (Spica), can look exactly the same with some small amount of processing. Of course that's not how it looks in the sky, but still a good one - astrophotography is not always about faithful reproduction. That's why I think Alex's photo is an interesting effort.
I don't think it's fair to speak about voters other than yourself. And anyway, if you say you know how an eclipsed Moon should look and this is not it, then I guess you were not deceived by this photo.
By the way, Spica is not an optical but a spectroscopic binary star (this is for the comment on Wendy's photo), so you can't tell if it is a binary from looking at a photo.
Sorry Alex for abusing this space... |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2026 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/01/2026 12:57:28 PM EDT.