Sparkle
by paperpages

Comment by peter:
Simple, glamorous ... only thing I would pick on is the DOF, wonder if the picture would pop out that much more if the rose was in focus. Creative idea!

Mistakes
by paperpages

Comment by aimeethetoo:
BAHAHA!! This is hilarious! Love your comment....poor guy! : )

Sparkle
by paperpages

Comment by BJokerud:
The idea is kinda good, but the light that strikes the ring (or whatever it is) is a little to harsh for my taste.

Sparkle
by paperpages

Comment by jim300:
hmmm, a really pretty ring, and a beautiful backdrop in this rose (very creative!!), but your title doesn't match, at least my view, of the photo!
I would have liked to see some amazing sparkle from the ring.
Maybe it's just me! Shoot this again with a star filter or some intense light, or F22(?) and I think it becomes an amazing shot!
But it is still pretty and I love your creativity, just not the photo with the title.

Sparkle
by paperpages

Comment by rodgers_le:
Not going to lie...just a wee bit jealous of those rings :) Nice depth of field.

Mistakes
by paperpages

Comment by levyj413:
LOL. Thanks for the humorous notes, too! :)

Sparkle
by paperpages

Comment by jballard:
I like the how the velvety texture of the rose contrasts with the sharp sparkles of the diamond

Sparkle
by paperpages

Comment by Ellen_Laurel92:
This picture is really pretty except for the left edge of the diamond ring being a tad blurry

Sparkle
by paperpages

Comment by glad2badad:
Hmmm. This could work well for a jewelry ad I guess. Not that comfortable classifying it as "glamour". I like the comp. You positioned the bud of the rose and the ring strategically. Lighting is a bit flat and one dimensional. All JMO of course. Good luck.

Mistakes
by paperpages

Comment by citymars:
One of my challenge favorites -- great find, fresh insight, and the image goes well with the sentiment. I like the "sepia" treatment, too.