Image |
Comment |
| 05/29/2003 03:37:11 PM |
The Antique Flavors of Homeby aimee_skittlesComment: 5. Fits the theme well enough, and there are no blatant 'you suck!' flaws to it, but neither does it really grab me for any reason at all. For reasons of composition, cropping, or subject choice, it's just a photo, and doesn't do especially much for me, aesthetically.
I do like the colors on the building, but the overall tone of the photo seems artificially dark (maybe to keep the sky from being blown out?), as if I'm viewing it through smoky cellophane. Probably due to your lens, the nominally vertical lines of the traffic signal and corner of the building lean to the right as they go up, giving it a slightly vertiginous feel. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/29/2003 03:25:39 PM |
Rolling Down Sunsetby buck4freeComment: Ha! A shot I've attempted myself, but you pulled it off better than I ever have. I love how everything's in focus, including the text on the mirror, and you clearly either rolled down the window or have much cleaner windows than on MY car. I also adore how the cloud line is contiguous between 'sky' and 'reflected in window'. |
| 05/29/2003 10:14:08 AM |
Road To Nowhereby auroraComment: The focus is ... weird, in this. I wanted to say it was blurry, but it isn't - maybe it WAS blurry, and then was sharpened enough so that the odd flat bright areas (leaves) were simply given sharp edges? It feels strange, as if some of the pebbles on the road were closerto the camera than the grass that's even with them in the frame. |
| 05/29/2003 10:12:50 AM |
CA State Capital Domeby ChrisW123Comment: Nice detail/lighting/focus, but the overall subject isn't particularly compelling. Maybe a different crop could have drawn the attention to particular architectural details, or something; as-is, the eye just kind of wanders without being drawn to anything especially. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/29/2003 10:11:37 AM |
Pensiveby AaronComment: The lighting on the cheek/neck is very harsh, and distracts the attention from his expression. This is a coulda-been-great that is instead just kinda neat. Good concept. Better focus and lighting might well have gotten a 10 from me; as it is, 7. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/29/2003 10:10:41 AM |
Cemetery Angelby sunflowerComment: What a charming model. :-> And good lighting to bring out her personality and contrast her from the background. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/29/2003 10:10:12 AM |
Black & white H2Oby ladpupmoeComment: Very contrasty, which is sort of good, but the very flatness of the tones makes it look more like an abstract painting (in chunks of solid color) than a duotone or nuanced photograph. Also, the glass, straw, and bottom drape are all just enough out of focus to be kind of annoying ... to me. Personal taste. :-> 6. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/29/2003 10:08:59 AM |
Concrete Christby davidspyleComment: I know where that is. :-> That Christ is darn hard to photograph, major kudos. Every time I try it looks wrong, or awkward. Good lighting-angle choice, too. However, the 'pose' is a little awkward (though better than I've ever managed), and the crop feels strange for some reason I can't quite articulate. Good try. 6. |
| 05/29/2003 10:07:47 AM |
Fragility in Blueby moodvilleComment: Gorgeous focus, lighting, contrast. The color adds nicely without being distracting (despite its strong saturation). Very, very well done. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/29/2003 10:07:23 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/13/2025 07:21:43 PM EDT.