Dating For Dummies
by Rego

Comment:
Greetings from the Critique Club :)

We have the option to skip over images where the photographer has provided no supporting information for the image.

John Setzler

Splash!
by arnit

Comment:
lol.. this is too funny :) = 10

Caught In The Act
by channeled

Comment:
I particularly like the red-eye and the motion blur :)

Will You Marry Me?
by jpb323red

Comment:
The lighting is too harsh.

Surprise bath camera
by KevinRiggs

Comment:
Cute snapshot :)

"Will you marry me?"
by jonpink

Comment:
This is a neat idea but the hands look 'dirty'.. .maybe the lighting and the post processing is causing this... not sure...

"God of Small things" by Arandwarati Roy
by Rooster

Comment:
Greetings from the Critique Club...

Hi Rooster...

Macro work is fun. I enjoy it quite a bit myself. There are a few elements of great macro photograhpy that I work towards when doing my own images. 1 - Make sure I have a subject that has interesting detail in a macro view. 2 - Choose a composition that makes that detail stand out with a lot of strength. 3 - Don't allow other elements of the photo to distract from my subject (this is the case with any photo.)

The bug in this photo may have some interesting detail on the other side (front view). The surface the bug is resting upon is quite contrasty.

Note: If you request in depth critiques on your photo, the CC members have the option of skipping over photos that have no information provided by the photographer. You should always include your exposure information and a note in the photographer's comments box describing your photo and any intent you may have had.

Cherry Kiss
by jaymeekae

Comment:
Beautiful shot... I love the lighting on this one... It might be worthwhile to play around with a very minor desaturation of the yellow channel on this one as well... excellent work :)

God Bless England.
by BobsterLobster

Comment:
Greetings from the Critique Club :)

Hi Bobster...

I think this is an excellent indoor architecture study. The lighting you have to work with here is actually very nice. I like the way the brighter light in the front window of the church seems to be symbolic of the light of a higher power :) I think you also did an excellent job of keeping the perspective distortion in check. Verticals usually seem to tilt inward because a photographer will not keep the film plane parallel to those verticals.

I don't think there is anything you can do to improve this image without employing a much wider angle lens.

Excellent work :)

Cirencester Church
by jonpink

Comment:
Greetings from the Critique Club :)

For starters, when you request an in-depth critique, it is beneficial for you and the critique giver if you have supplied the exposure information and your own comments and thoughts on the photograph :)

There appears to be some very interesting architecture in this church. The light at night is highlighting the textures and creating a lot of interest. Your chosen composition may work better for a daytime shot since there is a lot of darkness and missing detail here at night. As I look at this image, there is nothing of interest on the left half. This particular scene seems to make a better vertical composition by cropping off the left two thirds.

Without your own thoughts and comments here, I don't understand your choices :)