| Image |
Comment |
| 08/13/2011 05:47:24 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 08/13/2011 05:45:01 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 08/12/2011 08:36:25 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 08/12/2011 08:34:52 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 08/11/2011 07:35:41 AM |
eby bspurgeonComment: That's a good name. These would be far less interesting if the frame numbers hadn't bled through.
By the way, the film was (allegedly) fresh, not expired. Who knows... |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 08/11/2011 07:33:24 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 08/11/2011 07:30:30 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 08/11/2011 07:29:17 AM |
untitledby bspurgeonComment: Very Callahan. Looks like a promising start. I guess the overexposure has more to do with the double exposure than the developing? Or maybe the infrared (which I've never experimented with). |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 08/10/2011 06:20:20 PM |
Hopingby keeyewComment: Surprising and strange. Very unexpected. Brave. And more good things... |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 08/10/2011 06:18:51 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2026 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 06/27/2026 12:46:50 AM EDT.