will I be on facebook then?
by tnun

Comment:
Everyone is on FB. It's the Borg.

The image ... hard to see through the window and the background is overexposed, so congrats on that. Not sure the badness makes it good, though.

too big for your birches
by skewsme

Comment:
The focus on the reflection of the trees is actually quite nice. Oddly cropped with just bits of the right-side-up world showing, so I'll count that as a bit of badness. But I don't think the badness makes it good, if that makes sense.

flying high
by vikas

Comment:
This makes my eyes hurt trying to focus. Which is decidedly bad; so congrats on that. The image has a ghostly feel to it, which I'm rating as a good thing.

Adam & Eve
by GeorgesBogaert

Comment:
See, I kind of like images like this, where the motion of the camera and the light (did you use a flash?) make interesting patterns. So ... bad but not horrid, and definitely trending to good to my eye.

Here's Looking At You!
by Refocused

Comment:
That's unattractive. Reasonably composed and the DOF is nice, so not truly awful.

blowing in the wind
by Neat

Comment:
The result here is an interesting abstract. Which is good (I especially love that yin/yang object on the upper left). So I guess my interpretation of the image's badness, and there has to be some for this challenge, depends on what would have been a "good" capture of the scene. And I have no way of knowing that. So let's assume a middling degree of badness that made it to good. (BTW, my head hurts from trying to figure out how to vote on this!).

crookeries
by mariuca

Comment:
I don't know; I kind of like the shadows of the people on high. And the little people below. Not horrible.

20180221_134806
by Tiberius

Comment:
Another one that made me giggle. How many times has the camera autofocussed on the less interesting thing? That's assuming the flowers/leaves are more interesting than the traffic. So we'll give you the bad and add a bonus point for amusement.

urban jungle
by flaherma

Comment:
Composition isn't doing anything for me, but the birds seem to be in focus and the inclusion of the chains adds interest. Not terribly bad.

its real
by PennyStreet

Comment:
It's cluttered and underexposed in some places and overexposed in others. Also at a slight tilt, which is the kind I never like since I can't tell if the tilt is intentional or not. But it is telling a story of a city in the rain, so the clutter and harshness make sense to me, and the tilt could be indicative of the confusion of a tourist. Which is not so bad.