Phantom Run
by izadoodle

Comment:
Critique Club feedback -

This shot scored quite well given the nature of the image and the general reception of such images on the site, particularly in a highly competitive challenge such as a Free Study.

The tones in this image work exceedingly well with both the subject and the manner in which you executed the photo. I do find the lower right portion of the photo to be a bit of a drawback, as the presence of a large glaring white spot in the overall scene is extremely jarring.

Very nice work.

Levitate
by lovethelight

Comment:
Critique Club feedback -

You regularly submit well executed, creative shots and this is no exception. The lighting is very nice and the amount of effort you put into the shot certainly paid off. I'm actually puzzle as to why this didn't score higher as it pretty much delivers everything the 'typical' DPC style shot should. Who can predict the fickle tastes of the masses...

Very nice work!

Tintern Abbey: Through The Eye
by obsidian

Comment:
Critique Club feedback -

It is difficult to critique HDR images because I have a hard time telling what came from the camera and what came from the computer. so, ifsomeof these comments are way off base I apologize in advance.

Three things hold this image back and keep a wonderful subject from really catching the viewer's interest.

First, the tilt. While architectural shots are tough due to perspective warping, it is often best to make sure that prominent edges within the scene are level. here that would be the horizontal line about half way up the frame. Itwould also help to bring the crop down slightly to hide that bit of sky that creeps in and emphasizes another bit of tilt there.

Second, all the haloing and fringing. The purple fringing makes me think this is a lens quality issue from shooting such a high contrast scene, but it could also be from the HDR processing as I have seen it on other such shots. In either case, it is worth removing via history brush if the editing rules allow as they do in this case. Nothing screams 'photoshop' like haloing around the edges.

Finally, the ever present desire for sharpness in challenge entries. I think in a detail filled image like this, a desire for sharpness throughout the imageis both desirable and warranted.

Hopesome of that is helpful advice. Good luck!

Dark Realms
by Atlantis

Comment:
Critique Club feedback -

Very creative image and you've done a good job portraying the classic 'warlock' type of imagery. The only nitpickwould be the oversaturated areas of the flames which have turned into unsightly blobs of yellow.

This picture scored well so your efforts paid off and rightly so!

d a w n
by hotpasta

Comment:
Critique Club feedback:

Wonderful lighting and great capture of the reflections of the ships. Regarding the horizon tilt comments from the Flat Earth Society - what is tremendously reinforcing that perception is the tile of all the masts. Many vertical lines tilted to the right - the eye is tricked.

I have no other meaningful commentary. This is a very beautiful image and it score quite well as you would expect.

Very nicely done.

1929 Studebaker
by dtremain

Comment:
Critique Club feedback:

I have to laugh and admit that as soon as I saw this I thought to myself 'looks like one of dtremain's images' before even seeing the name below it.

I think the tones work well with the subject and certainly acheive the sort of look you were going for. Obviously a straight-on shot of a car is not going to fare as well in a free study as other subjects, simply from lack of excitement. This is nice for what it is, however.

Thanks!

Muncaster
by Sweetlittlepixie

Comment:
Critique Club feedback:

This is a very nice landscape and it works well in b/w. The range of tones is nice and the balance of the darkness below with the lights above works well. The overexposed bit of the sky doesn't work quite as well, and given the editing rules this might be a candidate for some selective masking to try and salvage that area if you are so inclined. Another thing to consider would be not splitting the image in half with the horizon, but rather emphasizing either the sky or the ground by lining the horizon up on the lower or upper third of the image.

Finally, looks like some sensor dust up near the top! Damnable dust bunnies.

Nice work!

The End of the Beginning
by Dr.Confuser

Comment:
Critique Club feedback:

You did a very nice job planting the cloudy sky in the image. Until I read your notes I thought it was real.

It is a very interesting looking statue. I think that cuts both ways in that it is nice to look at, but is really also someone else's effort on display.

On another note, this would make a stunning piece in black and white, all the moreso with that sky you added.

Good luck!

Play Boating
by Qiki

Comment:
Critique Club feedback:

I think the score this shot received is pretty much on the mark. The photo is decently lit, decently in focus and the composition is ok. Overall, everything is ok while nothing really stands out.

There is a yellow haze to the shot that actually makes this look like a faded/older photo. I think it is actually enhanced by the off-white border. Perhaps this was a look you were going for.

Obviously this would have fared better were there more action in the shot, but for what it is it isn't bad.

Good luck!

Beach Body Babe
by nsoroma79

Comment:
Critique Club feedback:

Lighting held this shot back from working as well as it could have. The overexposure along the right side of the model doesn't play well with the shadows falling along the other side of her body. I read in your notes you didn't use any lighting gear,so you take what nature gives. Might have been worth waiting a bit later in the day.

Other than that, the shot is a pretty good 'babe on the beach' type of shot. I think the composition works well, the semi-nudity is usually expected in these shots, and the pose itself isn't bad. The model's facial expression could use some work, but I'm not tasked with giving her a critique so she's on her own ;).

Look forward to more of your work!