| Image |
Comment |
| 06/07/2007 07:42:43 PM |
|
| 06/07/2007 07:41:16 PM |
Angelickby blissmoiComment: Maybe I'll find myself in the rude comments thread, but this is garbage. Pixelated garbage at that. |
| 06/07/2007 07:39:42 PM |
Art Schoolby posthumousComment: This type of photo resonates well with me. Unfortunately this crop really holds the shot back. The big blob of black doesn't add to the image, and really pulls the eye away from the subject. The subject and the detail behind it make this image, I would love to see the crop display them more prominently. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/07/2007 07:23:22 PM |
the answers are out thereby JPRComment: You could toss this up on deviantart and ready yourself for about fifty or sixty thousand downloads. Great abstract image with a dark feel. Would make a very slick wallpaper for the computer. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/06/2007 10:05:22 PM |
800_4483SusitnaBurmaFire.jpgby ShutterPugComment: Focus in most of these shots seems slightly off. Also, to be brutally honest, I think you should get the fire gear you were talking about and head for the action. Smoking trees just doesn't keep me looking. But even from here, some closeups of the firefighters could be interesting and present some subject matter with emotion/impact. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/06/2007 10:03:13 PM |
Toxicby jjusaComment: Cool in an avant garde sort of way. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/06/2007 09:59:43 PM |
Keith Richards Reincarnate.jpgby KronusComment: Good title.
The blown out windows/openings behind the bird are very distracting. Perhaps there was/is another angle to shoot from that doesn't put blinding spots of light behind the beast?
Good detail on its face. Good use of dof to pull the attention to it.
Nice crop/composition with the exception of clipping off part of its lower jaw. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/06/2007 09:51:51 PM |
Going Homeby levyj413Comment: In reply to your posting of this image in the nauseating 'is it art' thread...
Whoever told you to use a faster shutter speed is obviously an idiot. This is a very impressive shot, particularly how you acheived such absolute clarity/sharpness throughout the architecture while using a shutter speed slow enough to get a pleasing amount of blur on the subject.
Your score is pretty much all you could expect to get from entering this image on this website. This website caters to gimmick studio shots and hypersaturated, bullshit landscapes. Zero-thought-required images. Monkey sees, monkey likes, monkey votes.
Of course you know this, you've been here for some time.
Is this shot art? To someone it is. To others it's not. I would ride the fence. It's a bit of a cliche and, while technically impressive, it doesn't stir my emotions the way other photos do and that's my personal benchmark for what I consider to be art. Is it a good picture? Yes. You waste it on DPC. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/04/2007 08:04:41 AM |
Elements in Harmony by NuzzerComment: Horrific tone-mapping, but apparently I have no taste as you won a ribbon. So what can I say but, grats! |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/03/2007 02:48:39 PM |
the sky spells war by downtherabbitholeComment: Take it these are band shots and the look is intentional. Given that, I can get into them when otherwise I wouldn't. Still, I think they'd look even better with some stronger contrat. They look a bit grayed out. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2026 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 05/08/2026 11:07:20 AM EDT.