| Image |
Comment |
| 06/16/2010 09:59:22 AM |
|
 Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/26/2010 12:14:07 AM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/18/2010 11:25:35 PM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/17/2010 12:21:37 AM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/11/2010 12:05:02 PM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/05/2010 12:11:08 AM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/04/2010 10:57:27 AM |
dblby savooComment: Not sure why THIS one needed validation, but so be it :) |
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/04/2010 10:57:09 AM |
Disappearing Dollsby LSSComment: interesting angle. But a -2 strike for doing five "exposures" instead of a double per the challenge. Not a full DNMC, but a fair penalty. |
| 05/04/2010 10:51:52 AM |
Spare partsby sarampoComment: Interesting and clever shot! A little dark in exposure (as well as tone). However, -2 for doing four exposures instead of a double exposure. Bummer because I'm sure this took a LOT of work to do!!! 7-2 = 5 |
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 05/04/2010 10:50:07 AM |
The dreamby BrennanOBComment: Hm... interesting shot and processing, maybe a little over Topazed. However, it does not truly convey double exposure because the shot COULD have been achieved in a single exposure... had the same actor been in the bed/sofa and above, then it would have made more sense for the theme. |
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2026 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 07/23/2026 07:43:24 AM EDT.
