Image |
Comment |
| 02/25/2006 03:22:45 PM |
Tinted Temple & Treesby f-32Comment: Hey, I've been there. :-)
I had to go searching for this image (after you posted a comment on my pic of the Salt Lake Temple) as I hadn't yet stumbled upon it with the voting I had done so far.
Nicely done. I like the framing. I've taken several pictues of the St. George Temple and still am not really happy with what I've gotten. This shot looks pretty good. Good luck in the challenge. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 02/25/2006 03:20:14 PM |
Mercurialby JonoComment: The choice of color just isn't working for me... |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 02/25/2006 03:16:30 PM |
Early Morning Sydney by FirstyComment: It looks really cool... my only object would be as to the choice of color for the duotone. What would be better? I dunno... but this color just isn't working for me. The duotone application (in spite of the color) was done really well. Kudos. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 02/25/2006 03:13:42 PM |
Beach Candidby TranquilComment: A reflector would help out a lot in this situation. Or a good strong flash if you have one. (it's hard to compete against the sun) I do like the sun's highlights in her hair, it's just that the rest of her went a little too dark. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 02/16/2006 07:08:48 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 02/16/2006 07:05:50 AM |
Sloth, what else?by tedwardComment: Doesn't it seem like the car in the back (on the right) is in better focus and has better lighting than the main subject? |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 02/16/2006 07:04:40 AM |
Vanity begins youngby xXxscarletxXxComment: Feels like either too much Neat Image (how could a young girl's soft/smooth skin need NI anyway?) or maybe the camera wasn't in focus. Her eyes look like they may have been sharp, so maybe it's just very shallow DOF. But her nose, mouth, chin, cheeks all feel "strangly blurred" and the mole actually looks like motion blur which I don't understand because it looks like you had a lot of light.
Anyway, my point is... if this is the result of post processing, then I'm willing to bet that the original is much more compelling than this. Young kids don't need much post processing to look beautiful. :-) |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 02/16/2006 07:00:31 AM |
|
| 02/10/2006 10:42:11 PM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 02/06/2006 01:03:29 AM |
sexy in blueby anotherdayComment: I think they oughta break down the average score by male/female. I'd love to know the ratio on this shot. What the heck, I'm voting it high. :-) |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/15/2025 11:14:37 PM EDT.