| Image |
Comment |
| 06/04/2007 10:14:54 PM |
|
 Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/04/2007 10:14:17 PM |
Chooseby humanprotocoldroidComment: Very very good technical execution of a photo of a subject that isn't that interesting. Why should I care about this? I'm sure this seems unfeeling and overly blunt, but I'm not getting it. |
| 06/04/2007 10:11:31 PM |
Frequent Flyerby ccaComment: Snap ... don't know you or the dog ... so isn't that interesting to me. Sorry to be blunt. |
| 06/04/2007 10:10:50 PM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/04/2007 10:10:08 PM |
Angelickby blissmoiComment: What is this? I can make no sense of it ... therefore I must look at it as an abstract ... and don't find it very compelling. |
| 06/04/2007 10:09:16 PM |
Ou--ch!by VanGoghComment: Snap. Seems to me to be uninteresting to anyone not intimate with the subjects. |
| 06/04/2007 10:02:54 PM |
GRADUATION!!!by KismetComment: Too busy, poorly focused, can't figure out why I should be interested in the subject. Sorry for being blunt. |
| 06/04/2007 10:02:05 PM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/04/2007 10:01:03 PM |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/04/2007 09:59:55 PM |
Nosyby marvinComment: A photography instructor I had once taught me ... "a good photo has true blacks, true whites, and makes you want to be there with your daughter." This scores 1 for 3 on his scale. I suppose the subject is interesting in an agro sort of way. But it's not a subject I'm resonating with. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/18/2025 08:23:17 PM EDT.
