sound board
by oldbimmercoupe

Comment:
It's red. It's Yamaha... It's over processed like hell.

*shrug* not bad, not great. Best of the worst I fear.

There Is No Way This Will Ever Fit
by seethroughmylens

Comment:
Oh, so mom bought a new video card huh? So you thought maybe you should enter a snapshot of her trying to install it into a photo contest... Surely you didn't expect to do well?

Technically, it's sharp-ish, but it seems that the best focus in the image is on the dell logo on the motherboard. The story lacks, the composition is not great at all... *shrug* Good try, but you're gonna need to put more thought into composition and execution.

Personally, I would have loved to have just seen a nice macro detail shot of that beautiful card and heatsink.

Wind Power
by Kelli

Comment:
Overprocessed. Like crazy. That is all.

The biggest give away on the crazy processing here is the halos around the trees from tonemapping the image.

My suggestion for next time would be to separate the image into two halves, one the sky half, the other the ground and building, and adjust each separately, I would also suggest cutting back on the tonemapping, it's an awesome tool when used correctly, but a little goes quite a long way. :)

Harness Energy
by LanndonKane

Comment:
I have yet to see a good shot of this subject. Sorry, but it's a good concept, however this particular subject has almost become the unicorn of photography.

Electric milk frother
by hajeka

Comment:
Hmm... Too much negative space. Mostly OOF, point of interest isn't that interesting, and the image doesn't really convey "technology"... More like "gadgetry"...

Techno-Freak
by Mond

Comment:
Despite the cartoonish feel, the processing is actually quite well done. My question to you is "how does this convey technology to the viewer?" I don't really read "technology" in this photo... Overall it's pretty good, but borders on DNMC/snapshot. I think you'll finish towards the top of the middle.

Web Technology
by kprasad9375

Comment:
I see what you were trying to do. I'm fear that I must tell you though - for me, you've failed to tie the title to the image that's a ball, not a web... And the image itself isn't really telling me anything of technology. Plus its' a bit blurry.... Dunno, sorry, but this isn't doing much for me at all, despite the fact that I really, really want to like it, the thumbnail is much better than the full-size.

Audio Technologies: From a Single String to Millions of Hearts
by unbreakable

Comment:
I genuinely hope this ends up at the bottom of the pack.. Why in the heck would you do this to an image? The whole thing has become a eye gouging nightmare because of the processing.

The simple save here would have been to simply convert this to B&W, that would have taken away almost all of the eye-gouging aspects. I probably would have loved this as a super-low key image, perhaps if you had just cranked down the ISO and shot somewhat fast, then left me with an image of highlight and deep blacks, I probably would have preferred it... All personal preference really, but bright pinks and greens with lots of blur and grain isn't my thing. :)

Modern day watchtower
by wejna

Comment:
Strange. I don't know that it screams technology, but it's not bad either. My concern is the overall composition, why is this laid out like it is, why not symmetrical? Why not more context?

VHS City Center
by Lawton

Comment:
I like this, sorta... Mostly my issue is that the processing is really rough - too much high-radius contrast (structure), and too much saturation/contrast. I'm afraid that the image just feels blotchy and overcooked.