Image |
Comment |
| 02/12/2003 04:45:12 PM |
Negative Treemanby pauldComment: Cool, iery view, but I don't see any waldo. (Feel free to PM me with the location, but include the photo name, so I can update this comment) I really like the sense of this photo, it's really interesting work. With a Waldo, it's worth two more points. 6 Swash |
| 02/12/2003 04:40:19 PM |
Furry Creatures?by mariomelComment: Very cute photo! Good contrasts and very sharp focus. Busy, but then a waldo shot should be! (This was a popular idea {great minds think alike}, but this might be the best of this type, at least it's my favorite). 9 Swash |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 02/12/2003 04:38:27 PM |
~Not Clever Enough~by AnnidaComment: I see the leg.....It's an O.K. photo, but I can't really say the focus is good/bad or other (the plants seem less than distinct). The color seems a little diminished, try upping the saturation a little (digi-cams drain color, but a little saturation goes a long way). I keep thinking this needs something more....maybe a face peeking around the bush? 5 Swash |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 02/12/2003 04:32:39 PM |
Camoflagedby anelaComment: Turned the frame upside down? The focus is pretty good, color seems a little diminished (try saturating more, digi-cams seem to drain color out of a photo). All in all, it works pretty good. 8 Swash |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 02/12/2003 04:29:28 PM |
He's in Thereby AnachroniteComment: O.K. my old eyes aren't THAT good, but I'll just take your word that there is a person in one of those windows. Framing is O.K, but I think you might want to crop the right edge a smidge, to remove the street light on yellow. The sky is blown out, but I'm assuming it was partly cloudy and you couldn't do much with that (the sun shining on the building makes me question my last comment.) Focus is O.K., but due to the distances, the straight lines of the building come out a little jagged (esp. the white trim). 6 Swash |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 02/12/2003 04:25:27 PM |
hiddenby kellieComment: O.K. I see your waldo. The combination of the lighting and (I think) the black and white doesn't work well here. There seems to be quite a bit of light grain over most of the image. The window's light is fairly blown out. Focus is O.K., but hard to tell through the grain. 5 Swash |
| 02/12/2003 04:23:39 PM |
Pop Goes Waldo!by nathaliedooComment: Very cute and very colorful! I see your waldo. Focus is pretty good, but some kernels are more distinct than others. Lighting is good. Overall, I like it! 9 Swash
(DId you "pop" waldo?) |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 02/12/2003 04:18:16 PM |
Jailed and Forgottenby KonadorComment: Cute! Solid focus and bright color (but the white seems a little overly bright, esp in the upper middle of frame). Framing works. Challenge met, I see your waldo. A tad bit of glare on the windows. Nice trick. 7 Swash |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 02/12/2003 04:09:50 PM |
On Reflection I'm Waldoby LanceComment: I know I've commented this shot, but it didn't seem to "take". I see you in the gazing globe. It's a busy shot, but then again, waldo type shots should be busy. I really like the reflected sky, very nice. 7 Swash |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 02/12/2003 04:07:51 PM |
He Went Thataway!by GeneralEComment: Ehhh, I think you missed the point of the challenge. Is your finger the waldo? I don't think so. The maze ends and waldo isn't in the maze.....Good color and focus, well taken shot. Challenge aspect - no, not really met. 7 Swash |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/12/2025 11:56:56 AM EDT.