| Image |
Comment |
| 01/03/2010 04:06:51 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/03/2010 04:02:36 AM |
penumbralby skewsmeComment: OK, I'm going through the Free Study submissions, purposefully finding those images I think are shot with a less conventional eye - this is one of those images! Thanks for offering something that isn't just DPC friendly eye-candy (though of course there's nothing wrong with eye-candy). I'll be picking one of these images for the Mu (most underrated) award:
Positives: This interesting for a number of reasons, not least your aspect ratio. It does work though, it conveys a sense of the branches reaching up to the sun, try to glean as much as possible from the paltry light you have shown us. The sun itself obscured through the cloud is almost moon-like in its curtailed intensity. Most of all though, I like the detail you have captured in the lower clouds and the way that contrasts with the flatter, textureless majority of the image.
Critical stuff: Nothing at all really - any change would upset the balance you have created.
Overall: A very effective and well crafted image. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/03/2010 03:57:06 AM |
In the garden of the silent singing sculpturesby rooumComment: OK, I'm going through the Free Study submissions, purposefully finding those images I think are shot with a less conventional eye - this is one of those images! Thanks for offering something that isn't just DPC friendly eye-candy (though of course there's nothing wrong with eye-candy). I'll be picking one of these images for the Mu (most underrated) award:
Positives: I like the way this is more about shape and 'flow' than it is about the subjects themselves. The light is also effective and somewhat suggestive of care headlights - the feel you get when driving deserted roads at night. I like the coloration too - the near monochrome works very well.
Critical stuff: Somehow I wish it was a little softer to emphasise the flowing shape, a long exposure in the wind may have offered such an effect but then of course it would be a different image. I suppose I mean that the degree of sharpness you have offered here offers a little too much for the mood I get from the image.
Overall: An intriguing and effective image. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/03/2010 03:51:31 AM |
The Vortexby fisheyeComment: OK, I'm going through the Free Study submissions, purposefully finding those images I think are shot with a less conventional eye - this is one of those images! Thanks for offering something that isn't just DPC friendly eye-candy (though of course there's nothing wrong with eye-candy). I'll be picking one of these images for the Mu (most underrated) award:
Positives: It definitely lives up to its title, the sense of 'vortex' is very well communicated. It does work as an abstract.
Critical stuff: It is very harsh on the eyes - the limited number of shades and the banding make this an image than strays beyond abstract into something which is quite unphoto-like.
Overall: I'm sure you've pulled off the look you wanted but it's not an image I get a lot out of. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/03/2010 03:27:13 AM |
Sunriseby njsabsComment: Always wondered where you did your floaty shots - makes perfect sense now. It is of course wonderful. Some interesting choices here - the high contrast face and the unsharp slow moving elements. The piercing eyes are captivating. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/02/2010 06:25:23 PM |
I Don't Likey Santa!by dahlinComment: OK, I'm going through the Free Study submissions, purposefully finding those images I think are shot with a less conventional eye - this is one of those images! Thanks for offering something that isn't just DPC friendly eye-candy (though of course there's nothing wrong with eye-candy). I'll be picking one of these images for the Mu (most underrated) award:
Positives: This funny and really well executed too. I like the way Santa and Mrs seem t be completely unfazed! Could that child be crying any harder??
Critical stuff: I can see why you did it but a monochrome santa does seem to lack something.
Overall: A great candid shot - well made. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/02/2010 06:17:02 PM |
Street With No Nameby noranekoComment: OK, I'm going through the Free Study submissions, purposefully finding those images I think are shot with a less conventional eye - this is one of those images! Thanks for offering something that isn't just DPC friendly eye-candy (though of course there's nothing wrong with eye-candy). I'll be picking one of these images for the Mu (most underrated) award:
Positives: There's lots to look at here and the the light is very interesting. I really like the moon too. The road has an interesting quality to it.
Critical stuff: I think the intrinsic interest in the scene might fall short of that needed to please the voters.
Overall: A nice image which benefits from a sympathetic edit but one which in the final analysis may not have enough to give. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/02/2010 06:07:27 PM |
riding the railsby klkitchensComment: OK, I'm going through the Free Study submissions, purposefully finding those images I think are shot with a less conventional eye - this is one of those images! Thanks for offering something that isn't just DPC friendly eye-candy (though of course there's nothing wrong with eye-candy). I'll be picking one of these images for the Mu (most underrated) award:
Positives: I think the tilt really works here, especially with the placement of the rail in the bottom left corner. I quite like the coloration too.
Critical stuff: I think the softness / glow in the image is perhaps a little overdone.
Overall: An interesting picture but one that is perhaps a little over-edited. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/02/2010 06:00:04 PM |
If Walls Could Talkby BastaComment: OK, I'm going through the Free Study submissions, purposefully finding those images I think are shot with a less conventional eye - this is one of those images! Thanks for offering something that isn't just DPC friendly eye-candy (though of course there's nothing wrong with eye-candy). I'll be picking one of these images for the Mu (most underrated) award:
Positives: I really like the stark editing here, the blown walls work very well indeed and you have communicated the height of the building very well. I like how the textures have been brought out too.
Critical stuff: not too much, I like it as it is.
Overall: A very effective image which benefits from a well crafted edit and a great POV. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 01/02/2010 05:48:40 PM |
smoke shopby jet200nycComment: OK, I'm going through the Free Study submissions, purposefully finding those images I think are shot with a less conventional eye - this is one of those images! Thanks for offering something that isn't just DPC friendly eye-candy (though of course there's nothing wrong with eye-candy). I'll be picking one of these images for the Mu (most underrated) award:
Positives: An interesting juxtaposition for sure but even more interesting for me is the monochrome choice. I do like it, I think it is brave to not offer up the neon colour. I like the light too - the blackness particularly and how the neon is the only respite in this area. The foreground figure is very well placed too; a great POV.
Critical stuff: The small line top left is a little distracting and could've been cloned out under advanced rules but it doesn't hurt the image too much.
Overall: An interesting choice for a Free Study, I'm pleased you did. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2026 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 05/06/2026 02:40:57 PM EDT.