Love conquers all
by LynnS

Comment:
im not a fan of square frames. but this is a good shot.

Talk to CHUCK
by debitipton

Comment:
very interesting

Costal Poverty
by halopes

Comment:
amazing shot

Two Eyes
by KillerSOS

Comment:
Two eyes? If that would be sufficient to demonstrate the concept of EVEN, then i guess all portrait shots of people would qualify. But if portrait shots meet the challenge, then this is not the best portrait shot that i have seen. I have to lower the score. Cute kid, by the way.

Periferia
by Rino63

Comment:
I love photographs that have lots of geometry. I give this a 9, because i personally think it is a very beautiful shot, in consideration of all the basic technical aspects of it. But i would have loved it better had the composition included a living thing -- a boy, a little girl, a cat, a ghost lady's feet -- i dont know, i just wanted something peeking or walking from these steps. But hey, this could be restricted private property that's why these elements are not there. I still love how you capture this shot.

Untitled
by gunsmith6

Comment:
Not the best Optimus Prime portraits i have ever seen :) But really, yes 104 is an even number, but other than that, i dont see much more credit to the overall composition.

Duotrip
by CorySmith

Comment:
Very nice shot. Well done. But shots like this usually come in several attempts, that's why i was wondering, was this the best position you have for the biker in red? Not a very good one, i think. It would been better if both his hands were holding on to the handlebar. 8

sisters / evenly delicate
by narcisa

Comment:
Wow, this is so pleasing to my eye. Handbook example of effective application depth of field. 10.

Pigeons
by ytugcu

Comment:
Nice crop. Beautiful photo. I think it would have been better with a few more tweak on the contrast. 9.

(2)gether - (4)ever ...
by meshary_85

Comment:
Beautiful flowers. The background may have been blurred out, but i don't think it works here. I find it a little flat, so flat that it takes away the depth of field that i guess you wanted achieve in the first place. Still a good photo, though.