DSC_0013edit2.jpg
by dcano

Comment:
I really like this for night shots... would have score it about a 7. Got some issues with blown highlights and over-saturation.

Into the Darkness
by ShutterPug

Comment:
Just awesome !

Day-30
by idnic

Comment:
Perfect ending...

Want Some Whine?
by idnic

Comment:
Awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww! That is just toooo cute!

Tigers Group.jpg
by angela_packard

Comment:
Rar!!!! Throw me to the savages :-)

Down in the River to Pray
by angela_packard

Comment:
Very lovely shot... bet those dresses need a good cleaning though :-P

Soaring with the Eagles
by angela_packard

Comment:
You update button addict :-P

Long-Tailed Tit
by Konador

Comment:
Nice tit :-)

Del Primo Christ (The First Christ)
by AlexSaberi

Comment:
VERY WELL DONE!

Flambeau Time
by dleach

Comment:
I liked the motion and ambience you captured here. IMO, a pretty good capture. I would have cropped it to get here a bit off the center of the frame to strengthen compostion.

The title thing is subjective. I like (even as a photo editor) for a title to fill in gaps for me to tell me what is happening in the photo. At least, it should provoke me to look further into cut-line, story, etc.

Would it have scored higher with a different title? Probably not. I think I was in the minority on focusing on titles. But, that comes from my experience in journalsim.

Cropping for a stronger composition would have helped more IMO. But, voting is often on a total package. Never give the voters any reason to mark ya down, and that includes your title. See?

You got a lot of votes in the 4-5-6 range, so you have shown the voters a good technical photo. You just left them a few holes that they couldn't get past for higher votes.