| Image |
Comment |
| 11/24/2005 08:39:31 AM |
LEVEL FLIGHTby KRAZY2101Comment: Much, much too small. At this size it is impossible to truly judge this image. You can submit up to 640 px in size and as you will see from the other entries most people take advantage of this. Good luck with your next entry. |
 Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 11/24/2005 08:37:08 AM |
"odd !"by painthorseComment: What a shame this submission is so small - I really can't make out what these are meant to be. |
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 11/24/2005 08:36:12 AM |
Smile!by SamuelDPCComment: This is a great example of a bad picture rather than being anything odd. The concept is a good one, but difficult to execute, so keep on practising if you want to perfect it.
If on the other hand you wanted to submit a truly awful photo - you succeeded. |
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 11/24/2005 08:33:20 AM |
ODD One Outby Peshaw-99Comment: Good concept but for me there is too much symmetry in having the lights on the centre line of the image for this to come across as odd. Also there's no indication of what they are and the lights are blurry so it leaves the whole thing rather ineffective. |
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 11/24/2005 08:30:42 AM |
Eroded Rocks or Sealife?by kaidaehnkeComment: Sadly erosion is a natural phenomena that's been going on for hundreds of years, so it doesn't really qualify as odd. Good attempt here to catch the waves breaking on the rocks, but needs a bit sharper focusing and a faster shutter speed to really catch the moment. |
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 11/24/2005 08:22:32 AM |
Friendshipby anthonyczajaComment: A good idea and definitely representing oddness. The lighting seems good too, although it's a shame you've cut off the zebra's back - I wonder if there was a reason for that? |
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 11/24/2005 08:18:06 AM |
Three Grassesby joycobbComment: Your capture of the three grasses in the foreground is super - sadly though there is too much in the background distracting from them. You could perhaps have cropped this a bit tighter to improved matters. |
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 11/24/2005 08:02:32 AM |
What?!by M.O.C.Comment: This is most definitely odd! Such a shame you lost the focus on the top bits - are they ears? I have not a a clue what this is so perhaps not ears - maybe they're alien antennae! |
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 11/24/2005 08:00:35 AM |
Fiveby BudComment: A very brave attempt which, if you had got it spot on would have been a wow image. Sadly there is not enough focus in the middle ground of your shot to make it work - had the five 'pods' been closer to the foreground you might have got away with it. |
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 11/24/2005 07:54:29 AM |
What we might findby MQuinnComment: The foreground of this has a huge amount of potential - the sand and the metal ball are such contrasting surfaces, but I fail to see any advantage to the background. Perhaps I'm being dim and need this explained to me. |
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 06/19/2025 09:33:38 PM EDT.
