| Image |
Comment |
| 02/08/2006 04:22:26 PM |
Cyclistby JPRComment: Pretty good attempt at a difficult challenge. Tighter/cropped would be better. Would be better if subject were sharper, try matching the motion more exactly and/or slightly faster shutter speed. |
 Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 02/08/2006 04:20:55 PM |
Dusk Landingby eaglebeckComment: Pretty good attempt at a difficult challenge, especially since birding is hard enough. Would be better cropped and if subject were sharper, try a slightly faster shutter speed. |
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 02/08/2006 04:11:26 PM |
Speed Racerby I Enjoy HamComment: Rear end looks reasonably sharp, but front end is blurry, suggesting that you need more DOF. |
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 02/08/2006 04:07:04 PM |
High speed in the snowby pellemannenComment: Pretty good attempt at a difficult challenge. Would be better if subject were sharper, try matching the motion more exactly and/or slightly faster shutter speed. Great expressions. |
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 02/08/2006 04:02:53 PM |
Centrifugal Forceby mpetersComment: Pretty good attempt at a difficult challenge. Would be better level rather than odd angle, and if subject were sharper, try matching the motion more exactly. |
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 02/08/2006 04:01:02 PM |
Run To Your Futureby JudiComment: Pretty good attempt at a difficult challenge. Would be better if subject were sharper, try matching the motion more exactly and/or slightly faster shutter speed. |
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 02/08/2006 04:00:01 PM |
Inclineby BKerrComment: Pretty good meeting of the challenge. Level would be better, as the title cant make up for the odd angle shown by the buildings. |
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 02/08/2006 03:58:40 PM |
Knot Linesby vtruanComment: Nice idea and pretty good execution. Too bad the rotation costs sharpness. |
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 02/08/2006 02:58:30 PM |
Palm treeby erainmanComment: Interesting effect. Would be better if you were following a subject in motion to get motion blur separation from the background, not shooting while in motion at a stationary subject. Would be better without the obstructions of the mirror, etc. |
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 02/08/2006 02:56:27 PM |
<<Searchin4Light>>by amtyComment: Seems like you were trying for an interesting motion effect. Would be better if you were following a subject in motion to get motion blur separation from the background, not shooting while in motion at a stationary subject with no separation from the background. |
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/30/2025 08:59:45 AM EDT.
