Brianna
by nico_blue

Comment:
Normally I don't care for the eyes to be turned that far away, but it works in this case. This could come from a magazine. Very glamorous. You might want to move her out a little from the backdrop if you don't want the shadow.

His Royal Highness
by bandit

Comment:
Couldn't get his highness to look at you, huh? Nice portrait. Owner should be proud. Lighting was extra good.

Sitting On the Top Bleacher
by CLarson557

Comment:
The only thing that I don't like about this photo is the sunglasses. The reflection isn't adding any value to the photo. Great everything else.

Dusty
by militarygirl10

Comment:
Beautiful lighting, except for distracting hot spots in background. Flowers are a good angle to her face and her expression is perfect. Great capture.

Just A Girl
by LesleyNelson

Comment:
Beautiful lighting and good expression.

RYAN
by mandyturner

Comment:
Other than cropping out the light background on the left, i wouldn't change a thing.

Thinkin' Cool
by Pug-H

Comment:
Great capture. Beautiful child, I would have liked to see a bit more light on her face, perhaps if you had used a reflector to bounce some light into it . Background is a bit busy, but not a real problem.

Lady With A Pearl Earring (An Interpretation of a Classic Painting)
by JunieMoon

Comment:
This seems like a good start, but your model appears out of focus and her lips look as though she was speaking.

Kissed by an Angel
by CalliopeKel

Comment:
IThis is a lovely little lady, but I find the thick dark eyeliner on a child that looks this young to be a bit much. Instead of enhancing her eyes in a positive way, it appears to make them scream at you in a negative way. It seems that the overall photo has a bit too much saturation or contrast making it seem too harsh. I do feel it was a good choice to fill the frame with your subject.

Three Upset Angels
by moonjeong

Comment:
These kids are precious. It could be my eyesight but it appears that the little one in back isn't as clearly focused as the two out front. Possibly a bit more depth of field needed? i don't know how you got them to stay still that long.