Image |
Comment |
| 06/13/2006 05:28:05 AM |
|
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/13/2006 05:25:27 AM |
Water Drop Revisitedby RikkiComment: Sorry to see you only in the 4th place with this beautiful photo, very well done on all techicals and it´s simply awesome in it´s simplicity. Nice work my friend! Message edited by author 2006-06-13 05:26:25. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/13/2006 05:20:40 AM |
Child in Nature ~ Mirrors Redux by jenesisComment: Awesome shot Jennifer! First time seeing it too as I didn´t vote in this challenge, congrats on a new top score, you are fast becoming a ribbon hog :) Love this, put it in my favorites! |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/13/2006 05:19:07 AM |
Me Myself and I by terjeComment: Congrats dude, sorry to "steal" the blue ribbon from you like that, this shot is awesome! I am over in Stavanger pretty much every year and I am always on my way to this fjord to take pictures, this will sure be a kick in the butt to do so next time I am over. Cheerz! |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/12/2006 01:55:59 PM |
Spiders on the beach??by NstiG8trComment: This image has awesome image quality so for that alone I gave a 7. Love the DOF. Not as keen on the angle it´s shot from though, would have preferred this better I think if it were shot more at the same level the spider is at rather than from above like this. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/09/2006 05:53:29 AM |
Speedby KronusComment: Take this with a grain of salt since I normally like tack sharp, non abstract and artistic shots, I am pretty anal about image quality. That means that I normally don´t like blurry photos and well this does pretty much nothing for me. I think it´s a bit over the top, too much movement and not having a facial expression in there somewhere hurts the shot for me personally. Also just barely cutting off the feet like that doesn´t work for me. Again, I beg you to keep in mind that this is just me and I normally don´t like these kind of shots, this is the kind of shot you either love or hate and I bet there are tons of people who will love this. Keep on experimenting, I like that you seem unafraid of that :) |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/09/2006 05:45:56 AM |
Radar Loveby KronusComment: Pretty cool shot, works well and well done on all the technicals, it´s well exposed, composed and sharp as a tack! Only thing missing I think is that the photo is a bit monotone, would be so cool if you had something else of a different color in there to mix it up, like a yellow bee or hornet somewhere in the photo. Nice work! |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/09/2006 05:44:12 AM |
Plantworldby sherpetComment: I like to echo the comments you have already gotten but I think I would have liked the front page better if the purple around the phot were just white, the purple that is the backround color kindof draws away from the impact of the beautifully symmetrial photos of the flower and I think I would notice the front page much better in a store if it were like that. The font is good :) |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/09/2006 05:40:29 AM |
Jade Fanby sherpetComment: Same as the purple Fan but I like that coloring better, this one least and blue one best. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
| 06/09/2006 05:40:00 AM |
Purple Fanby sherpetComment: Well since this is the same as the other three, just with other color tones I´ll give the same exact comment :) I really like the composition here, I am not normally fond of abstract macros but you really seem to have found your niche with shots like these, there is absolutely nothing I would change about this shot. |
Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/26/2025 05:05:00 PM EDT.