WTC-Amish
by Herblacklist12

Comment:
Significant overexposure, and lacking a point of interest.

Sounds From the Past
by ExoticChaos

Comment:
Interesting subject but enough out of focus as to really undermine the image.

Home
by photoqwest

Comment:
Nice eye for composition. Unfortunately the overexposure really washes out some detail here. This would be a great photojournalistic image with a bit less lighting oradditional exposure compensation.

Crawling Cats
by ellamay

Comment:
Awesome detail! I like the depth of field in this as almost anything more in focus would compete with the busy subject. Great job!

Albany from across the Hudson River
by Dave Gordon

Comment:
I like the top - bottom balance of this, but I find the city to be the more interesting focus. Unfortunately, the foreground boat is what the image's composition and perspective emphasizes to me. Also feels hazy - some more lighting would and sharpness would bring out more of the architectural detail. Great idea - there is a lot of interest in this city scape.

The Greatest Generation
by blemt

Comment:
Not enough depth of field. There is blurring int he foreground and background. Great composition - I really like the idea and "feel" of the image.

Fresh Supply of Scented Incense in a New Spa
by librodo

Comment:
The blurring in the lower sticks is a significant didtraction froman otherwise well composed image. Needs more depth of field to bring it all into focus.

Unexplored Underground
by redmoon

Comment:
The blurring on the signs is distracting, but you've got a great eye for composition. This looks like a scene from StarTrek.

Box Lunches
by sher

Comment:
Great lighting and detail in this. I love the balanced feel... I could ewnvision this on the wall in a restaurant somewhere. Very nice!

bad boy gets a time out
by coolhar

Comment:
There is an unnatural definition between the boay and background. Possibly oversharpening? Seems generally washed out as well, which I'm guessing is overexposure.