| Author | Thread |
|
|
02/03/2009 08:27:23 AM · #26 |
Originally posted by librodo:
I think it is already deleted.
He said to me : "I don't like you anymore." |
Yes, it has been taken down. :)
I hope he learned his lesson. |
|
|
|
02/03/2009 09:58:28 AM · #27 |
| It's a good thing this got resolved before the Aussies got to him... |
|
|
|
02/03/2009 10:40:35 AM · #28 |
| It was still there a couple hours ago and I left the comment that I believed permission to use the photo had been denied. |
|
|
|
02/05/2009 09:01:53 AM · #29 |
| A DPCer just alerted me to this photo. Look familiar? Even worse, it was picked up as an example of bad Photoshopping and there wasn't any! Grrr.... |
|
|
|
02/05/2009 09:10:29 AM · #30 |
Originally posted by scalvert:
Even worse, it was picked up as an example of bad Photoshopping and there wasn't any! Grrr.... |
I think what the 'bad photoshoppers' are saying is that the extra fingers were introduced inadvertently due to some bad photoshopping (other examples on the site show extra limbs and arms and legs twisted in strange directions because of genuinely bad photoshopping)
Either way, it's stolen. |
|
|
|
02/05/2009 09:21:13 AM · #31 |
Originally posted by JH:
I think what the 'bad photoshoppers' are saying is that the extra fingers were introduced inadvertently due to some bad photoshopping... |
Probably, but it's amusing/annoying that there was basically NO Photoshopping. This has happened before. I few years ago, this shot took first place at the Photoshopping site Worth1000.com... only I didn't enter it, and it was a Basic Editing photo. Some character actually "reverse-Photoshopped" it into separate images and claimed my shot was a composite of those. I had it removed within an hour. Somehow I doubt the website in Argentina will even acknowledge my copyright infringement note. :-/ |
|
|
|
02/05/2009 10:19:54 AM · #32 |
Originally posted by scalvert:
Originally posted by JH:
I think what the 'bad photoshoppers' are saying is that the extra fingers were introduced inadvertently due to some bad photoshopping... |
Probably, but it's amusing/annoying that there was basically NO Photoshopping. This has happened before. I few years ago, this shot took first place at the Photoshopping site Worth1000.com... only I didn't enter it, and it was a Basic Editing photo. Some character actually "reverse-Photoshopped" it into separate images and claimed my shot was a composite of those. I had it removed within an hour. Somehow I doubt the website in Argentina will even acknowledge my copyright infringement note. :-/ |
Unfortunately, some people seem to use DPC as a source of free stock photos.... :-/ (One disadvantage of high placement on the google images index) |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Prints! -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/29/2024 10:42:05 AM EDT.
