| Author | Thread |
|
|
03/20/2006 06:54:14 PM · #1 |
|
|
|
03/20/2006 06:57:57 PM · #2 |
|
|
|
03/20/2006 06:58:02 PM · #3 |
this is fake, i have nothing to back it with, but theres no way, this is realy
|
|
|
|
03/20/2006 07:00:26 PM · #4 |
Originally posted by doctornick:
And a 40mm f/1.2... |
I did notice that doc , that would be some lens |
|
|
|
03/20/2006 07:05:47 PM · #5 |
Originally posted by TroyMosley:
this is fake, i have nothing to back it with, but theres no way, this is realy |
So far everyone of these "rumours" have turned out to be true....Canon's marketing dept. "leaking" details ahead of time...most likely... |
|
|
|
03/20/2006 07:10:18 PM · #6 |
| A 40 1.2 would have to have a BIG physical aperture, that looks like a 50 1.4 to me.. |
|
|
|
03/20/2006 07:26:49 PM · #7 |
| Eye focus control is back for digital? Cool! |
|
|
|
03/20/2006 07:53:43 PM · #8 |
It's exactly what I want....and it's a fake.
The 3 looks PS. The L on the lens is off angle. And the Eye Control text looks like a cut & paste job.
But darn it, MAYBE, it will make Canon realize that many of us want a $3,333 Canon 3D with Eye Control! |
|
|
|
03/20/2006 08:04:51 PM · #9 |
Yeah its a fake. The grip is photoshopped from a nikon model. Oh, how I hope it was a fake...
|
|
|
|
03/20/2006 09:24:28 PM · #10 |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 06/16/2025 08:14:48 PM EDT.
