DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Hardware and Software >> Lens choices for motorsports photography?
Pages:  
Showing posts 1 - 12 of 12, (reverse)
AuthorThread
12/01/2008 11:31:27 PM · #1
Hey guys its been awhile. Next year I'm going to be shooting photos for several sponsored motorcycle racers. In the past I've used my cheapo Sigma 70-300 lens. It worked great except that I need slower shutter speeds to portray the motion better. Basically I need some stabilization. Which lenses should I be looking at? I need to have the reach of 300mm still so the 70-200 f/2.8 lenses are out. I don't want to have to use a teleconverter. I was thinking about the Sigma 50-500 aka "Bigma" because its the zoom range is so versatile. What do you guys think? Here is a link to a previous post with some pics so you see what I'm talking about. Thanks!

Motorcycle racing pics
12/01/2008 11:37:32 PM · #2
Have you looked at Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS?
12/01/2008 11:48:28 PM · #3
Originally posted by mobster:

Have you looked at Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS?


I love that lens but its too expensive for me. Canon L glass is out of my budget unfortunately.
12/02/2008 03:13:32 AM · #4
I have the Canon EF 70-300mm f/4.0-5.6 IS USM which is very good for panning as the IS has a panning mode. I also have the 100-400 which is a great lens, the quality is much better than the 70-300 but the IS is actually better on the 70-300!!

The 100-400 isn't that much more than the sigma 50-500, though it would be interesting to know the quality of the sigma and if it has panning stabilisation as that extra 100mm would be useful
12/02/2008 04:26:03 AM · #5
i shot a 2 day event with the 85mm f/1.8. If you get in the right spots it's easy. Sure, you might get muddy but you don't miss a thing.

Of course, this depends how close you're willing to get to the action and how muddy you want to become, but it worked like a charm and i can recommend it.
12/02/2008 04:42:18 AM · #6
The 50-500 doesn't have stabilisation, as I recall.

Have you thought about simply investing in a monopod?
12/02/2008 04:50:42 AM · #7
Originally posted by Mr_Pants:

Have you thought about simply investing in a monopod?


Yeah, you want a monopod and a manfrotto MN080 monopod belt pouch. It makes it so much easier to keep the camera steady when panning
12/02/2008 04:52:01 AM · #8
Originally posted by Tez:

i shot a 2 day event with the 85mm f/1.8. If you get in the right spots it's easy. Sure, you might get muddy but you don't miss a thing.

Of course, this depends how close you're willing to get to the action and how muddy you want to become, but it worked like a charm and i can recommend it.


It also depends on the fencing at the circuit, sometimes you have to stand further back so you can get higher to look over the fence
12/02/2008 04:57:32 AM · #9
Doesn't Canon make a 70-200 f/4 IS? Combine that one with a 1.4x extender. And like Bobocanus said, I also see that the 100-400 L is not much more than the Bigma. Maybe there are some secondhand options?

85mm for roadracing is too short.

I have pretty good results with a 70-200 2/8 and a third party 1.4x extender.



Some of these are cropped, some are not. Shot with a 6mp camera. The 8mp of the 30D will give a little bit extra room.
12/02/2008 05:07:46 AM · #10
Originally posted by Azrifel:

Doesn't Canon make a 70-200 f/4 IS? Combine that one with a 1.4x extender.


Canon do but it's not that much cheaper than the 400, add the convertor and they are about the same.

Those bike shots are awesome Azrifel
12/02/2008 09:55:59 AM · #11
Originally posted by Azrifel:

Doesn't Canon make a 70-200 f/4 IS? Combine that one with a 1.4x extender. And like Bobocanus said, I also see that the 100-400 L is not much more than the Bigma. Maybe there are some secondhand options?

85mm for roadracing is too short.

I have pretty good results with a 70-200 2/8 and a third party 1.4x extender.



Some of these are cropped, some are not. Shot with a 6mp camera. The 8mp of the 30D will give a little bit extra room.


Great shots Azrifel!!! The background motion blur is the exact look I'm needing. Yeah I was looking at Canon's 70-200 f/4 IS. That would be a pretty good option, I just wish it has more reach than 200mm. If I spend $1200 on a lens I don't want to have to buy a teleconverter too! :o Hmm.....
03/31/2009 12:50:12 AM · #12
Bumping for more ideas. My first race event is in two weeks and I'll be renting my lens. My local shop has the Canon 100-400L and the 70-200 2.8L for rent. Which should I get and why? Thanks everyone!
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 04/24/2024 03:59:10 AM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Prints! - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 04/24/2024 03:59:10 AM EDT.